1993
DOI: 10.1016/0923-2494(93)80103-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of the macrophage-cancer relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding revealed the dual nature of Ms, which depending on their in vivo context can impart diametrically opposed activities. For example, although vital effectors of innate immunity, Ms may contribute up to or more than half of a tumor's mass [22] and are actually required for the tumor to survive [20][21][22]28]. To ensure survival, tumors actively recruit monocytes by producing chemotactic agents, including transforming growth factor-␤ (TGF-␤) [29] and M chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) [30], which promote M infiltration [21,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding revealed the dual nature of Ms, which depending on their in vivo context can impart diametrically opposed activities. For example, although vital effectors of innate immunity, Ms may contribute up to or more than half of a tumor's mass [22] and are actually required for the tumor to survive [20][21][22]28]. To ensure survival, tumors actively recruit monocytes by producing chemotactic agents, including transforming growth factor-␤ (TGF-␤) [29] and M chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) [30], which promote M infiltration [21,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%