1978
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(78)90116-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of the wear of polycrystalline diamond tools in rock removal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the above being reminiscent of tool wear in metal cutting. Hibbs and Lee (1978) used a setup akin to metal turning in order to study the wear behavior of polycrystalline diamond, PCD, cutters while cutting sandstone. A fundamental cutting investigation by Okubo et al (1999) compared tool bit wear and cutting mechanism of 47 rock samples with those in mortar and metal cutting applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above being reminiscent of tool wear in metal cutting. Hibbs and Lee (1978) used a setup akin to metal turning in order to study the wear behavior of polycrystalline diamond, PCD, cutters while cutting sandstone. A fundamental cutting investigation by Okubo et al (1999) compared tool bit wear and cutting mechanism of 47 rock samples with those in mortar and metal cutting applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• macroscopic failure which was believed to be the result of the impact shock fatigue (very similar to failure mode (ii) reported by Hibbs et al [99,100]),…”
Section: Drag Pick Cutterssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Hibbs and Lee conducted a study into the wear mechanisms that operate when PCD is used in a rock removal process [57]. They used very coarse-grained PCD, approximately 100- m grain size, to cut a helical groove in a mortar rock cylinder containing hard particles of quartz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 17. Resistance of grain boundaries to fracture and abrasion after rock drilling shown by Hibbs and Lee[57]. Panel (a) shows that a grain boundary has not preferentially fractured despite being close to the cutting edge and panel (b) shows that there is no preferential abrasion of a grain boundary parallel to the cutting direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%