2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some best‐fit probability distributions for at‐site flood frequency analysis of the Ume River

Abstract: At-site flood frequency analysis is a direct method of flood estimation at a given site. The choice of an appropriate probability distribution and parameter estimation method plays a vital role in at-site frequency analysis. In the current article, flood frequency analysis is carried out at five gauging sites of the Ume River in Sweden. Generalised extreme value, three-parameter lognormal, generalised logistic and Gumbel distributions are fitted to the annual maximum peak flow data. The L-moment and the maximu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal statistical assumptions of at-site and RFA include independence, stationarity and randomness of data series at each gauging site (see e.g., Ul Hassan et al 2019;Hussain et al 2017;Shahzadi et al 2013 andKousar et al 2020). To investigate the serial correlation of the observed data series at each gauging site, we use the lag-1 correlation coefficient (r).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal statistical assumptions of at-site and RFA include independence, stationarity and randomness of data series at each gauging site (see e.g., Ul Hassan et al 2019;Hussain et al 2017;Shahzadi et al 2013 andKousar et al 2020). To investigate the serial correlation of the observed data series at each gauging site, we use the lag-1 correlation coefficient (r).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013 and Kousar et al . 2020). To investigate the serial correlation of the observed data series at each gauging site, we use the lag‐1 correlation coefficient ( r ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the K‐S test returns a p ‐value $\ge $0.05, we considered that annual streamflow follows the assumed distribution. We used the method of maximum likelihood estimation to fit the distribution parameters, which is a powerful and efficient method accepted by many researchers (Ceola et al., 2010; Hasan et al., 2021; and Kousar et al., 2020) because it estimates parameters with the smallest sampling variance (Rao & Hamed, 2019).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to make accurate estimations of the flow rate for divided return periods. In the literature, there are studies in which flood discharge was calculated for several return periods (Kamal et al, 2017;Garmdareh et al, 2018;Bhat et al, 2019;Kousar et al, 2020;Mangukiya et al, 2022). Design flow rates are derived from the annual maximum discharges observed over many years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%