1962
DOI: 10.1128/jb.83.1.207-208.1962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Clinical Laboratory Briefs on Staphylococci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is all the more surprising that neither Shaw, Stitt, and Cowan (1951) nor Thatcher and Simon (1957) seem to have been able to accept Evans' results as a base for ending the long-standing confusion about the taxonomy of the catalase-positive cocci. In other recent studies on staphylococci, such as those of Schaub and Merritt (1960), Grun and Pulverer (1960), Angyal (1961), Clark, Moore, and Nelson (1961), Fink (1961), Krynski et al (1962), Kimler (1962), and Vogelsang, Wormnes, and Ostervold (1962), no attention was paid to anaerobic dissimilation of mannitol. It may well be that failure to choose the right type of carbon source, or lack of familiarity with a reliable routine test for anaerobic metabolism of carbohydrates, has been the cause of this lack of acceptance of Evans' results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is all the more surprising that neither Shaw, Stitt, and Cowan (1951) nor Thatcher and Simon (1957) seem to have been able to accept Evans' results as a base for ending the long-standing confusion about the taxonomy of the catalase-positive cocci. In other recent studies on staphylococci, such as those of Schaub and Merritt (1960), Grun and Pulverer (1960), Angyal (1961), Clark, Moore, and Nelson (1961), Fink (1961), Krynski et al (1962), Kimler (1962), and Vogelsang, Wormnes, and Ostervold (1962), no attention was paid to anaerobic dissimilation of mannitol. It may well be that failure to choose the right type of carbon source, or lack of familiarity with a reliable routine test for anaerobic metabolism of carbohydrates, has been the cause of this lack of acceptance of Evans' results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. aureus produces coagulase or ferments mannitol, or does both, whereas S. epidermidis is coagulase-negative and does not ferment mannitol. Weckman and Catlin (21) noted almost complete correlation between coagulase and deoxyribonuclease production among staphylococcal isolates, a finding confirmed by others (8,13). Lately, several laboratories have reported the isolation of coagulase-negative, mannitol-negative, and deoxyribonuclease-positive staphylococci; some of these isolates gave additional reactions characteristic for S. aureus (19, 20; C. H. Zierdt and D. W. Golde, Bacteriol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The slide (bound) and tube (free) coagulase (4, 5, 22) and mannitol-fermentation tests are the conventional tests for the characterization of micrococcal isolates as Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis (1,2,8,9,(11)(12)(13)(15)(16)(17). S. aureus produces coagulase or ferments mannitol, or does both, whereas S. epidermidis is coagulase-negative and does not ferment mannitol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more extensive study, Mossel (21) reported that 2.1% of 389 coagulase-positive strains failed to ferment mannitol and 4.8% of 188 coagulase-negative strains fermented mannitol (anaerobically). Kimler (19,20) found that about 1% of his strains of staphylococci were coagulase-positive and mannitol-negative and about 8% were coagulase-negative and mannitol-positive. He stated that based on 112 coagulase-positive and 49 coagulase-negative strains there was better agreement with mannitol fermentation and other reactions in the case of the coagulase-positive strains than in the case of coagulase-negative strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%