2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00026-012-0158-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Combinatorial and Analytical Identities

Abstract: We give new proofs and explain the origin of several combinatorial identities of Fu and Lascoux, Dilcher, Prodinger, Uchimura, and Chen and Liu. We use the theory of basic hypergeometric functions, and generalize these identities. We also exploit the theory of polynomial expansions in the Wilson and Askey-Wilson bases to derive new identities which are not in the hierarchy of basic hypergeometric series. We demonstrate that a Lagrange interpolation formula always leads to very-well-poised basic hypergeometric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recently pointed out in [13] that the Ismail-Stanton result (Theorem 2.2) in [15] is also the special case of the above formula. However, it is worth noticing that by using the theory of basic hypergeometric functions the origin of several combinatorial identities of Fu and Lascoux, Dilcher, Prodinger, Uchimura, and Chen and Liu was well explained in [15]. Here we presented a different proof using contour integrals which is direct and simple.…”
Section: Corollary 42 For Integers M Nmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been recently pointed out in [13] that the Ismail-Stanton result (Theorem 2.2) in [15] is also the special case of the above formula. However, it is worth noticing that by using the theory of basic hypergeometric functions the origin of several combinatorial identities of Fu and Lascoux, Dilcher, Prodinger, Uchimura, and Chen and Liu was well explained in [15]. Here we presented a different proof using contour integrals which is direct and simple.…”
Section: Corollary 42 For Integers M Nmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is a common generalization of Dilcher's identity [7] and of some identities due to Fu and Lascoux [9,10]. It has been recently pointed out in [13] that the Ismail-Stanton result (Theorem 2.2) in [15] is also the special case of the above formula. However, it is worth noticing that by using the theory of basic hypergeometric functions the origin of several combinatorial identities of Fu and Lascoux, Dilcher, Prodinger, Uchimura, and Chen and Liu was well explained in [15].…”
Section: Corollary 42 For Integers M Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operator D x is appropriate for B n (a, x), whereas the corresponding operator for the basis {ϑ n (a, x)} is the Wilson operator ( [9,20]) defined for an even function f by (a, x)) n , the multiplication formula…”
Section: Multiplication Coefficients Of Askey-wilson and Wilson Polynmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this motivation, several authors have recently investigated (28) and they extended it along several directions: see for example [1,3,9,10,12,13,20,22,24,25,31,32]. In [23], Prodinger shows the inversion of (28),…”
Section: Duality For Multiple Q-harmonic (Non-strict) Sumsmentioning
confidence: 99%