1999
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/10a/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some comments on heterogeneity at the glass transition

Abstract: Different kinds of static and dynamic heterogeneity at the glass transition are discussed in relation to recent experiments. Heterogeneous lengths are distinguished from cooperative length scales - in particular, in geometrically confined systems - and these are compared with finite-size effects in computer simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45,46 Although our experiment, based on its small contact size and experimentally applicable velocities, should be insensitive to such long-range density fluctuations, the ultraslow process can couple to the ␣ relaxation, leading to apparent nonergodic time-averaged correlations occurring on the time scale of the ␣ relaxation. 45 Finally, it should be noted that in many experiments, the structural relaxation time is comparable to the ␣-relaxation time ␣ for 1 msϽ ␣ Ͻ 100 ms. 47 This time regime is applicable to most of the data discussed in Fig. 4 except for the two divergent points at T = 377 and 380 K, with relaxation times of 3700 and 430 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Fig 3 Friction-peak Intensity F Fmaxmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…45,46 Although our experiment, based on its small contact size and experimentally applicable velocities, should be insensitive to such long-range density fluctuations, the ultraslow process can couple to the ␣ relaxation, leading to apparent nonergodic time-averaged correlations occurring on the time scale of the ␣ relaxation. 45 Finally, it should be noted that in many experiments, the structural relaxation time is comparable to the ␣-relaxation time ␣ for 1 msϽ ␣ Ͻ 100 ms. 47 This time regime is applicable to most of the data discussed in Fig. 4 except for the two divergent points at T = 377 and 380 K, with relaxation times of 3700 and 430 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Fig 3 Friction-peak Intensity F Fmaxmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Different kinds of static and dynamic heterogeneity at the glass transition, in relation to recent experiments, were discussed by Sillescu. 212 He states that during the last few years a number of experimental methods have been developed whereby a dynamically distinguishable sub-ensemble can be selected in a supercooled liquid close to T g and its return to the full equilibrium ensemble can be subsequently monitored. These experiments provide a pragmatic way of quantifying heterogeneity via the selection procedure.…”
Section: Ln[ Ln ( )] Lnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior of a many glass-forming substances at temperatures near T g gives evidence for regions of different molecular mobility, that is, for heterogeneity. The dynamical properties of the regions can vary with time. In this case, the heterogeneity is said to be dynamical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%