2014
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1812-2014-182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some common fixed point and invariant approximation results for nonexpansive mappings in convex metric space

Abstract: In this work, we introduce a new class of self-maps which satisfy the (E.A.) property with respect to some q ∈ M, where M is q-starshaped subset of a convex metric space and common fixed point results are established for this new class of self-maps. After that we obtain some invariant approximation results as an application. Our results represent a very strong variant of the several recent results existing in the literature. We also provide some illustrative examples in the support of proved results. MSC: 46T9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the context of convex metric space and extend the results of Kumar and Rathee (2014) to four self-maps by utilizing this newly introduced concept. Further, we ensure the existence of common best proximity point for generalized non-expansive type maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…in the context of convex metric space and extend the results of Kumar and Rathee (2014) to four self-maps by utilizing this newly introduced concept. Further, we ensure the existence of common best proximity point for generalized non-expansive type maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Then after, Beg and Azam (1987), Fu and Huang (1991), Ciric (1993), and many others have obtained fixed point theorems in convex metric spaces. Very recently, Kumar and Rathee (2014) defined the concept of (E.A.) property in the setup of convex metric space and ensure the existence of common fixed point for a pair of maps satisfying this property by omitting the assumption that the range of one map is contained in other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations