2013
DOI: 10.2298/fil1308455e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some consequences of an inequality on the spectral multiplicity of graphs

Abstract: We present two distinct applications of an inequality relating the multiplicity of an eigenvalue of a graph to a certain subgraph. The first is related to a recent classification, established by Kim and Shader, for the class of those trees for which each of the associated matrices have distinct eigenvalues whenever the diagonal entries are distinct. We analyze the minimum number of distinct diagonal entries and the corresponding location, in order to preserve such multiplicity characterization. The second appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a tree is minimal provided there is a matrix such that number of distinct eigenvalues is equal to the diameter (counting edges) plus one. From Theorem 4.1, we conclude that the wide double paths are minimal, for 2 , 4 1 , 3 5 . In fact, with t 3 = 0, t 2 = 2 + 4 , and t 1 = ( 1 − 2 ) + ( 3 − 4 ) + 5 + 2, since the number of distinct eigenvalues is 1 + 3 + 5 + 2 and the diameter is 1 + 3 + 5 + 1.…”
Section: Maximum Multiplicitiesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a tree is minimal provided there is a matrix such that number of distinct eigenvalues is equal to the diameter (counting edges) plus one. From Theorem 4.1, we conclude that the wide double paths are minimal, for 2 , 4 1 , 3 5 . In fact, with t 3 = 0, t 2 = 2 + 4 , and t 1 = ( 1 − 2 ) + ( 3 − 4 ) + 5 + 2, since the number of distinct eigenvalues is 1 + 3 + 5 + 2 and the diameter is 1 + 3 + 5 + 1.…”
Section: Maximum Multiplicitiesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We remark that the Parter-Wiener Theorem was reformulated in the survey work [7], by the second author, motivated by the earlier seminal work of C. Godsil on matchings polynomials [9,10,11]. The same approach produced a result for the multiplicities of an eigenvalue of a matrix involving certain paths of the underlying graph, with many interesting applications to general graphs [4]. Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we note that star complements have been used to establish sharp upper bounds for eigenvalue multiplicity in further classes of graphs, including trees [88], cubic graphs [95], and graphs with prescribed girth [89]. Some results from [88] have been refined in [46].…”
Section: Star Complementsmentioning
confidence: 99%