1982
DOI: 10.1016/0167-6377(82)90051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some consequences of estimating parameters for the M/M/1 queue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the rates are constant, we can observe the system in steady state for a long time. This means that we can assume we have enough data on our own arrival and service process (λ v and µ v , or just ρ v ) and on the blocking probability that we do not need to consider uncertainty in our estimates; for discussions of estimating our own rates, see [13,21].…”
Section: The Homogeneous Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the rates are constant, we can observe the system in steady state for a long time. This means that we can assume we have enough data on our own arrival and service process (λ v and µ v , or just ρ v ) and on the blocking probability that we do not need to consider uncertainty in our estimates; for discussions of estimating our own rates, see [13,21].…”
Section: The Homogeneous Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) disqualifiesρ naive /(1 −ρ naive ) as a good estimate of the expected number of customers in the system (in the limit) of a stable M/M/1 queue. The fact that ratios of estimators in queueing processes may have undesirable sampling properties stems from Schruben and Kulkarni [7]. Zheng and Selia [8] construct alternative estimators for the limiting expected number of customers in queue (and several other performance measures) that have better sampling properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most basic estimator of ρ is perhaps the naive ratio estimatorρ [7] and Zheng and Seila [8] for the M/M/1 queue, where it was noted that ρ naive frequently exceeds unity with positive probability and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferential methods from classical and Bayesian statistics have been previously described. In regard to classical statistical methods, Clark [9] presented a maximum likelihood estimator and approximations for λ and μ, and Schruben and Kulkarni [10] showed that estimating the arrival rates and mean service times (1 / μ) may result in a noticeable difference between the estimated model and the real system. More recently, Kannan and Jabarali [11] described an application of M/M/1 queues and presented maximum likelihood estimates for queues formed along two periods, namely normal demand periods and holidays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%