“…Chernyavskaya, T. McEnery, E. Wilson, P. Baker, and other researchers of corpus linguistics deal with the study of the influence of discursive practices on the formation of social and political reality, as well as the discourse as a form of social interaction by combining general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical knowledge, critical discourse analysis and the method of corpus analysis for the study of specific and repetitive discursive practices (Plungyan 2008;Chernyavskaya 2017;McEnery, Hardie 2011;McEnery, Wilson 2001;Baker et al, 2013). The attention of the researchers in the field of corpus analysis is aimed at identifying, comparing, and interpreting collocations, keywords, concordances, and their usefulness through sample analysis of corpus (Evert, 2008;Granger, Bestgen, 2014;Handl, 2008), the study of technological processes related to the design, selection and processing of language material based on text corpora (Zubov, Zubova, 2004;Finegan, 2004;Gries, 2015), the analysis of corpus linguistics' current contributions to research in linguistics and the digital humanities, including comparing corpus techniques against other digital methods that are currently more popular amongst humanities researchers (Brown, 2020), the critical analysis of the discursive reproduction of racial stereotypes, biases and prejudice against people of other nationalities (Baker et al, 2013;Baker et.al, 2008;Mautner, 2009). Summarizing the research on this issue, we note that the interests of linguists are mainly concentrated around the collocation possibilities of words, concordance in order to determine the stylistic, semantic, and cultural shades of their meanings, which are caused by the specifics and ideological attitudes of society.…”