Two experiments examined the presumed relationship between behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control. In Experiment I, pigeons were exposed to mult VI I-min VI L-min or mult VI 5-min VI 5-min during baseline training prior to mult VI I-min VI 5-min discrimination training. Half of the subjects received a timeout (TO) component during baseline in order to reduce the degree of contrast during discrimination training. Only 3 of 8 subjects receiving the TO showed contrast while all other subjects showed various degrees of contrast. Postdiscrimination generalization gradients indicated excitatory rather than inhibitory control by the stimulus associated with the VI 5-min schedule. During baseline training in Experiment II, responding to all the generalization stimuli was reinforced. In addition, some subjects received the TO stimulus. The subjects were next exposed to mult VI I-min EXT, mult VI I-min VI 5-min, or just the VI 5-min component. Generalization gradients indicated inhibitory control by the stimulus associated with EXT or VI 5-min for 19 of 20 subjects even though some subjects did not show contrast. These results question the presumed relationship between behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control.It has been suggested (Farthing & Hearst, 1958;Terrace, 1966Terrace, , 1968Terrace, , 1971Weisman, 1969;Yarczower, 1970) that the OCCurrence of behavioral contrast is a necessary antecedent for the development of inhibitory stimulus control. For example, Weisman (1969) reported V-shaped postdiscrimination generalization gradients (a presumed correlate of inhibitory stimulus control) around a stimulus associated with a variable-interval (VI) 5-min schedule of reinforcement for only those subjects exhibiting behavioral contrast during multiple (mult) VI l-min VI 5-min discrimination training.If a relationship exists between contrast and inhibitory stimulus control, then manipulations which modulate the degree of behavioral contrast should also modulate the degree of inhibitory stimulus control. One procedure that has been successfully used to produce and modulate behavioral contrast is timeout from reinforcement (TO), which consists of darkening the operant chamber and response key for a specified duration. Reynolds (1961), Sadowsky (1973, Taus andHearst (1970), and Wieth and Rilling (1972) have found that behavioral contrast will occur during one component of a multiple schedule if that component is alternated with a TO component.The TO procedure coupled with the Friedman and Guttman (1965) finding that if behavioral contrast is produced in one discrimination phase then no further contrast is evident in a subsequent discrimination phase, leads to an experimental design which allows for the modulation of behavioral contrast and the later determination of inhibitory stimulus control. Therefore, it was the purpose of Experiment I to employ TOs· during baseline training in an attempt to reduce the degree of contrast normally concomitant with the initiation of discrimination training. Inhibitory st...