SAE Technical Paper Series 2015
DOI: 10.4271/2015-24-2414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Developments in DES Modeling for Engine Flow Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason for considering hybrid approaches for engine modeling is the increasingly compelling need for high-quality time and space resolved numerical data sets, but at a reduced computational cost compared to standard LES, as outlined in [8][9][10][11]. Most of the studies currently reported in the scientific literature are based on the Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES) concept and its derivatives [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], while a few of them relies on the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) approach [15,16,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for considering hybrid approaches for engine modeling is the increasingly compelling need for high-quality time and space resolved numerical data sets, but at a reduced computational cost compared to standard LES, as outlined in [8][9][10][11]. Most of the studies currently reported in the scientific literature are based on the Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES) concept and its derivatives [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], while a few of them relies on the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) approach [15,16,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the development and application of URANS/LES hybrids for ICE simulation has marked a significant acceleration in recent years, 5 with a number of proposals including the scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) approach, 69 the dynamic length-scale resolution method (DLRM) 10,11 and both seamless and zonal formulations of the detached eddy simulation (DES) technique. 4,8,9,1219 In order to be practically appealing, URANS/LES hybrids are expected to be at least as accurate as wall-modeled LES (WMLES), which is considered as the current standard for scale-resolving ICE simulations. 8,2024 Furthermore, they are expected to bring additional benefits such as (a) easier management of boundary conditions at inlets/outlets (if open boundaries are placed in URANS-treated zones), (b) relaxed computational cost requirements (especially close to solid walls), (c) sharing of a common framework with URANS-based sub-models (wall treatment, combustion, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly speaking, a hybrid URANS/LES method should be based on the ability to adapt its behavior by applying the best-fitting modeling option with respect to the available numerical resolution. In the past 10 years, the number of engine-related hybrid modeling applications has been constantly increasing [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], but hybrid/LP investigations are almost absent [27,28]. In our study, we evaluated two previously developed hybrid scale-resolving approaches [21,24,28,29] for a computational analysis of the "Spray G" reference GDI injector [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%