2008
DOI: 10.29173/cmplct8778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Differences between Maturana and Varela 's Theory of Cognition and Constructivism

Abstract: The theory of cognition of Varela and Maturana differs in specific aspects from constructivist theories and so should not be seen or interpreted as another form of constructivism. To encourage the emergence of a discussion on important differences between both theories, this paper aims at highlighting three of these specific aspects, namely the biological roots of cognition, its phylogenic and ontogenic basis, and the nature of reality and knowledge. In many regards, it is possible that the first two points we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, dialogue is the essence of education: it is through dialogic interaction that knowledge emerges [35,43], through discourse that we think and create meaning [44,45]. There is evidence that the way talk is used in classrooms affects learning [46], and analysis of classroom talk is core to understanding the effects of remedial interventions [47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, dialogue is the essence of education: it is through dialogic interaction that knowledge emerges [35,43], through discourse that we think and create meaning [44,45]. There is evidence that the way talk is used in classrooms affects learning [46], and analysis of classroom talk is core to understanding the effects of remedial interventions [47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La cognición entonces depende tanto de procesos reflexivos e interpretativos que realiza el individuo como de su acción. De hecho, Varela y Maturana (Proulx, 2008) le dan tanto peso a esta relación que acuñan el concepto de enacción, en donde se especifica que no existe una sola definición de lo real, sino que existe una interpretación subjetiva de la realidad que depende no solamente de los procesos cerebrales del individuo y de su memoria sino de la acción de sus sentidos.…”
Section: El Emprendedor Y Los Procesos Cognitivosunclassified
“…However, how to learn to become an 'effective' teacher, a 'good' teacher is not a case of simply observing and copying another person or applying theories of learning and teaching. It involves a continuous circular process where both knower and known are brought forth and co-specify each other (Proulx, 2008). In TRUVIC students formed a collective consciousness that observed, became comfortable in a school, in different pedagogical spaces, got to know adolescent students, then volunteered to teach as they saw how they could contribute to the schoolteachers' lessons.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%