1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1965.tb02158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Differences in Infant Feeding and Elimination Training in Five European Longitudinal Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the U.S.A. a shift is reported [3] from earlier longer breast-feeding periods in low socioeconomic groups to longer period for middle class. Contradictory results have been obtained in England [9]. The results reported from Belgium I201 and Sweden [17] agree with ours, namely a long duration of breastfeeding in the highest social class.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the U.S.A. a shift is reported [3] from earlier longer breast-feeding periods in low socioeconomic groups to longer period for middle class. Contradictory results have been obtained in England [9]. The results reported from Belgium I201 and Sweden [17] agree with ours, namely a long duration of breastfeeding in the highest social class.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Hytten & Thomson [lo] stress the difficulties in making comparisons, as in many of these studies incomplete data are given on, for instance, social class, the mother's age, civil status and gainful employment, and the child's successional number in the family. I n a recent investigation Hindley et al [9] compared infant-feeding in samples from Brussels, London, Paris, Zurich and ours from Stockholm, studied by similar longitudinal methods. These studies are coordinated by the International Children's Centre in Paris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, why anorexia nervosa ensued, as opposed to some other psychiatric condition, was not clear. Most of these patients had been breast fed for longer periods than is usual when compared with a London Group (Hindley et al, 1965), but only 15 per cent had previously shown earlier feeding difficulties, in contrast to the experience of some authors. Their personalities were closely akin, however, to those found in the previous studies of Kay (1953) and Crisp (1965), but no prognostic significance could be read into them as Lesser et al (1960) tried to do.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In comparison with his control group, there was a bias towards no breast feeding or to prolonged breast feeding. Such comparisons could not be made for the present series, although they could be compared with the findings of Hindley et al, (1965) The present series showed that 85 per cent were still breast feeding at 1 month, 70 per cent at 3 months, 60 per cent at 5 months, 40 per cent at 6 months, 30 per cent at 7 months, 25 per cent at 8 months, and 5 per cent at 9 months, i.e. one girl who was not weaned until 18 months old.…”
Section: Early Developmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This may be due to the pediatric origin of this project which pointed to very striking cross-national differences even in the age of walking (Hindley, 1966). Unfortunately, the project turned over increasingly into a loose combination of research efforts carried out most effectively by the London team (Moore, 1967(Moore, , 1968.…”
Section: The Concept Of Culture-specific Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%