2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2008.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some discretizations of geometric evolution equations and the Ricci iteration on the space of Kähler metrics

Abstract: In this article and in its sequel we propose the study of certain discretizations of geometric evolution equations as an approach to the study of the existence problem of some elliptic partial differential equations of a geometric nature as well as a means to obtain interesting dynamics on certain infinite-dimensional spaces. We illustrate the fruitfulness of this approach in the context of the Ricci flow, as well as another flow, in Kähler geometry. We introduce and study dynamical systems related to the Ricc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 4.3 in [19]), there is a constant C such that (18) log(e hg det(u ij )) = −u + C 7 on U . Therefore…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 4.3 in [19]), there is a constant C such that (18) log(e hg det(u ij )) = −u + C 7 on U . Therefore…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplier ideal sheaves can also be constructed from the Kähler-Ricci flow ( [14], [17], [8]) and its discretization ( [16], [18]). As mentioned in Remark 1.4, we shall discuss the multiplier ideal sheaves constructed from the Kähler-Ricci flow on the toric del Pezzo surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also see [66] and in particular [66, Corollary 10.12] which contains a reinforced version of the inequality. In [24,Remark (1), p. 217], there is another proof which does not rely on symmetry, based on a result in [49].…”
Section: A Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This invariant was first discussed, although not explicitly defined, by Tian in . It was first explicitly defined by Rubenstein in and was further studied by Szekelyhidi in . Tian's invariant is defined as follows: Definition Let (X,ω) be a Kähler manifold with ω2πc1false(Xfalse).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%