Studies on the behaviour of enteric plexus-free preparations of the small intestine were first carried out by Magnus (1904a-c). He found that when the longitudinal muscle of the cat's small intestine is stripped off the underlying circular coat, the ganglion cells of the myenteric plexus of Auerbach adhere to the longitudinal layer and the circular muscle can be freed from ganglia. Magnus found that these ganglion-free circular muscle preparations did not contract rhythmically when suspended in Locke's solution and concluded that spontaneous contractions normally observed in intestinal muscle are neurogenic in origin. All later workers, however, observed spontaneous activity in the completely ganglion-free circular muscle (Gunn & Underhill, 1914; Alvarez & Mahoney, 1922;Evans & Underhill, 1923;Gasser, 1926; Eura, 1927;Van Esveld, 1928).Magnus also used the ganglion-free preparations of circular muscle to study the site of action of certain drugs, including nicotine, eserine and barium. These pharmacological experiments have been repeated by Gasser (1926) and by Van Esveld (1928). Although these three workers used similar methods in preparing ganglion-free intestinal strips, their results disagree both with regard to spontaneous activity of the ganglion-free preparations and their reactions to nicotine. Magnus and Gasser found that nicotine does not cause contraction of the ganglion-free strips, and concluded that stimulation of the intestinal muscle by nicotine is due entirely to an action on the ganglion cells of the myenteric plexus. This view is now generally accepted, but is contradicted by the findings of Van Esveld who found that nicotine stimulates the ganglion-free preparations. Van Esveld's findings, which he checked by a careful histological search for ganglion cells, have received surprisingly little attention.