Some effects of viscosity on the dynamics of replenished magma chambers

Abstract

Some aspects of the dynamical behavior of magma chambers, replenished from below with hotter but denser magma, have been modeled in a series of laboratory experiments. In previously reported work the fluids used were aqueous solutions of comparable viscosity, and thus the results should be applicable to basaltic magma chambers, in which the magmas do not vary greatly in viscosity. In that case, the lower layer cools by convective heat transfer to the fluid above, and crystallization causes the density of the residual liquid in the lower layer to decrease. When the density becomes equal to that in the upper layer, sudden overturning and intimate mixing take place. The present paper reports experimental results that allow us to extend the application to systems in which there is a large viscosity ratio between the resident and the injected fluid, for example, to calcalkaline magmas, where magma viscosity can vary by as much as 5 orders of magnitude. The largest viscosity ratio in our experiments (about 3000) was achieved using cold glycerine for the upper layer, above a hot denser KNO3 solution. The most striking new feature with the very viscous upper layer is that now less dense fluid is released immediately and continuously from the interface and rises as plumes through the upper layer. Further crystallization occurs in the plumes, and the crystals fall out, but there is little mixing, and a layer of depleted KNO3 solution is eventually deposited at the top. The transfer process between the layers is dominated by interfacial effects, with the high‐viscosity upper layer acting as a nearly rigid lid that allows buoyant fluid to accumulate just below the interface and then rise in localized plumes across the interface into the viscous layer. This physical picture is supported by a series of experiments in which the viscosity ratio is varied systematically; the mixing behavior changes gradually between that described above for a large viscosity ratio and the sudden over‐turning characteristic of layers with comparable viscosity. The importance of the viscosity ratio, rather than just an increase in viscosity, is confirmed by experiments in which both viscosities are increased by the same factor; the overturning process is then slower, but symmetrical. Other variations suggested by previous experiments are also described: the release of gas by a chemical reaction, to model the release of volatiles following an overturning event in a magma chamber; the effect of a cold, immiscible layer above the cooling crystallizing fluid; the influence of two viscous layers with a density step between them; and the constraining effects of a density (with corresponding viscosity) gradient in the upper region. The experiments indicate that whatever the stratification, whether it be in layers or continuous, the form of the initial motion in the upper fluid is determined by the viscosity ratio between the two fluids immediately adjacent to the interface. Geological applications are not examined in detail in this paper, but the experime...

On the conditions of magma mixing and its bearing on andesite production in the crust

“…Previous work has considered magma mixing using analogical, numerical or experimental approaches [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] , which have all yielded valuable information on the fluid mechanics, leading to efficient stirring. However, the rigorous evaluation of the conditions favourable to intimate magma mixing has been hampered by the difficulty of simulating mixing at high pressure, and by the complex fluid-mechanical behaviour of magmas.…”

“…The injection of denser basalt into a lighter reservoir most likely produces viscous gravity currents spreading at the floor, leading to a stratified two-layer system 15 , except when excess momentum is available, which may induce fountaining 16 . Ensuing crystallization can lead to density inversion producing either local 17,18 or wholesale 19 overturning and associated mixing/mingling, depending on viscosity contrast 20 . Observations and fluid dynamical considerations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] have shown that, in calcalkaline reservoirs, mixing/mingling most likely starts either from such boundary layer instabilities 17 , with centimetre to decimetre wavelength scale 18 , or from breakup of injected magma dykes 12 .…”

The 2009 paroxysmal explosions at Stromboli (Italy): magma mixing and eruption dynamics

“…Assuming anhydrous conditions and temperatures of 1,140-1,115°C, and based on the model of Giordano et al (2008), the calculated viscosities of the LP and HP liquid phases range between 10 2.5 and 10 3.4 Pa s, decreasing by one order of magnitude under hydrous conditions (10 1.3 -10 2.4 for H 2 O 1-2 wt.%). The analogous and relatively low viscosities of the melts (i.e., the liquid phases) can further enhance the efficiency of magma mixing (Huppert et al 1984;Campbell and Turner 1986;Bateman 1995). Chaotic mingling of poorly viscous melts, along with chemical diffusion, can account for the chemical exchanges that produced domains of intermediate composition (Perugini et al 2003;De Campos et al 2011).…”

Field Evidence of Magma Mixing from Concentric Zoning and Mafic Microgranular Enclaves in Bunam Stock, Korea

“…마그마 혼합의 양상은 마그마 상호간에 작용하는 여러 가지 요인들 중에서 점성 차이가 매우 중요한 역할을 한다 (Huppert et al, 1984;Campbell and Turner, 1985;Blake and Campbell, 1986). Vernon, 1984;Castro et al, 1990).…”