1969
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008<0460:seitmo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Errors in the Measurement of Reynolds Stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaimal and Touart (1967) proved that stress measurements are best evaluated in natural coordinates, with the vertical Cartesian wind component along the plumbline vertical. Therefore great care was given to the alignment of the Kansas sonic anemometers (Kaimal and Haugen, 1969) and to the detection of sonic anemometer signal drift by anechoic calibration . This implies that any upflow occurring at the sonic anemometer location would actually result in a spurious average vertical wind component W in the evaluated data: for S = 1.4", we would get w = 0.02G.…”
Section: Upflow At the Sonic Anemometer Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaimal and Touart (1967) proved that stress measurements are best evaluated in natural coordinates, with the vertical Cartesian wind component along the plumbline vertical. Therefore great care was given to the alignment of the Kansas sonic anemometers (Kaimal and Haugen, 1969) and to the detection of sonic anemometer signal drift by anechoic calibration . This implies that any upflow occurring at the sonic anemometer location would actually result in a spurious average vertical wind component W in the evaluated data: for S = 1.4", we would get w = 0.02G.…”
Section: Upflow At the Sonic Anemometer Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the spectral peaks shift with changing terrain roughness, the magnitude of Er was observed to be -9% over open water (Wieringa, 1972), -14% over the Tsimlyansk plains (Dyer and Hicks, 1972) and ~19% over the rougher Bedford observation site (Kaimal and Haugen, 1969). For the flat Kansas site, comparable with Tsimlyansk, a round estimate of ET = 15% stress decrease per degree upflow is taken.…”
Section: Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one major exception to this generality was the estimated value of the G cross-correlation for each anemometer. Such cross-correlations are known to be affected by as much as lo-12% per degree of vertical misalignment (e.g., Kaimal and Haugen, 1969;Dyer ef al., 1970), an error estimate which was confirmed by comparisons of rotated and non-rotated data in the present case. Thus rotation by the mean elevation angle to ensure that C became identically zero was carried out for all & results presented here.…”
Section: Mean Wind Speed and Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement accuracy is inherently limited by the accuracy to which the lengths of the acoustic paths, the direction cosines of the path geometry, and the acoustic transit times are measured (e.g. Kaimal and Haugen 1969). Finally the sonic array, composed of the acoustic transducers and their support structure, can itself modify the flow that is being measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%