1971
DOI: 10.2514/3.6164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some experimental results on sphere and disk drag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
120
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
28
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As one could expect, the wake structure is exactly that of the flow past a fixed disk, once the uniform flow at infinity has been removed. The drag coefficient C D ≃ 1.20 compares well with the value C D ≃ 1.23 determined experimentally by Roos & Willmarth (1971); the recirculation length, l R , obtained by determining the point of the symmetry axis where V x = −1, is l R ≃ 2.2, in good agreement with the value l R ≃ 2.1 obtained numerically for Re = 116.9 by Meliga, Chomaz & Sipp (2009a).…”
Section: Base Flowsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As one could expect, the wake structure is exactly that of the flow past a fixed disk, once the uniform flow at infinity has been removed. The drag coefficient C D ≃ 1.20 compares well with the value C D ≃ 1.23 determined experimentally by Roos & Willmarth (1971); the recirculation length, l R , obtained by determining the point of the symmetry axis where V x = −1, is l R ≃ 2.2, in good agreement with the value l R ≃ 2.1 obtained numerically for Re = 116.9 by Meliga, Chomaz & Sipp (2009a).…”
Section: Base Flowsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since the flow is steady and symmetric in this range, a 2D, steady-state, axisymmetric model could effectively capture the flow structure. Furthermore, the experimental drag data taken in the steady flow field was more reliable than measurements taken during vortex shedding at higher Reynolds numbers [24]. Additionally, the drag coefficient correlation used for comparison was valid for incompressible flows (at low Mach numbers), which required low velocities (and, therefore, low Reynolds numbers) [2].…”
Section: External Flow Over a Spherementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A figure displaying the spread of the percent difference with the 2 published sources can be seen in Figure 16. Based on the close alignment with the Clift et al correlation [4] and low average percent difference with the Roos and Willmarth experimental data [24], the Fluent simulations are very successful at modeling the drag on a sphere with drift flow conditions. …”
Section: D Axisymmetric Drift Regime: Domain Size Mesh Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8. The drag coefficient measured by Roos and Willmarth (1971) and the drag coefficients computed by Mittal (1999) and Sheard et al (2003) are also presented for comparison. The results of the present study match well with results of previous research.…”
Section: Laminar Flow Around a Spherementioning
confidence: 99%