1953
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1953.3.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some extension theorems for continuous functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1955
1955
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, by a result of E. Michael [39], Y is an AE for all paracompact spaces. This implies that f −1 : f (A/G) → A/G → Y extends to a continuous map F : B → Y .…”
Section: Equivariant Lifting Of Closed Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, by a result of E. Michael [39], Y is an AE for all paracompact spaces. This implies that f −1 : f (A/G) → A/G → Y extends to a continuous map F : B → Y .…”
Section: Equivariant Lifting Of Closed Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Supposing A is a closed G% set in the (collectionwise) normal space (X, T), A is the zero set of some Remark. This note grew out of an attempt to verify an assertion appearing on p. 806 of [6] where it is asserted that simultaneous extenders from A to X will exist provided A is a metrizable closed subset of a paracompact space X (the hypothesis that A is also a G g was inadvertently omitted). …”
Section: Lutzer1 and H Martinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing in mind that point-finite refinements may be made precise [2, Theorem VIII 1.4], one may adapt Michael's proof of Theorem 2 in [5] to show spaces both N-metacompact and X-collectionwise normal are N-paracompact. Similarly, adapt McAuley's proof of Lemma 2 in [4] to handle the case where Z is semimetric.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%