1950
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb05225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOME FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PREMATURITY part II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the few studies that have been conducted of the relation between short and long interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes, no definitive conclusions could be drawn because of methodologic constraints or because the number of women studied was small. [8][9][10][11] We addressed this question by studying vital-statistics data recorded in Utah. These data offer an excellent opportunity for evaluating the relation between interpregnancy intervals and birth outcomes because the average parity of mothers there is relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the few studies that have been conducted of the relation between short and long interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes, no definitive conclusions could be drawn because of methodologic constraints or because the number of women studied was small. [8][9][10][11] We addressed this question by studying vital-statistics data recorded in Utah. These data offer an excellent opportunity for evaluating the relation between interpregnancy intervals and birth outcomes because the average parity of mothers there is relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in an analysis of data on 5301 births to multiparous British mothers from March 3 to 9, 1946, birth intervals of three to six years were associated with the lowest risk of birth weights less than or equal to 5.5 lb (2.5 kg). 9 The study, however, was based on birth interval, which overestimates the risk of adverse outcomes for short intervals between pregnancies. 2,3 Moreover, among white infants born in the United States during 1981, both short and long interpregnancy intervals correlated with an increased risk of low birth weight, 10 although that analysis did not consider maternal age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of prematurity (e.g., Baird, 1945;Blegen, 1953;Douglas, 1950;Drillien, 1958;1959a;1959b;Eastman, 1947) have considered social factors because of the high prematurity rate in low social classes: The poorer development of such premature infants has sometimes been attributed to their poorer environments. Thus, social factors might represent a source of impairment independent of the insult variables and of low birth weight, but to some extent confounded with them.…”
Section: Impairment Of Development Of Prematures IV Neonatal Infectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Há muito tem-se estudado os efeitos do intervalo intergestacional para a saúde materno-infantil 4,6,18,19 . Estes estudos têm--se limitado, entretanto, à análise de aspectos biológicos, sem se proporem a abordar seus efeitos dentro de uma perspectiva do tipo comportamental.…”
Section: Tempo Médio Do Aleitamento Natural Segundo Intervalo Intergeunclassified