1982
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450600103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some ideas on cracking catalyst design

Abstract: Progress in understanding the nature of cracking catalysts has led from the early recognition of the carbonium ion intermediate to the current view which ascribes cracking activity to the acidic nature of active sites. Here we develop the concept of acid catalysis to include the specific effects of Bronsted and Lewis acid sites on gas oil cracking. It is shown that these two types of sites react with specific substrates and that each has a characteristic kinetic behaviour. This leads us to suggest that careful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II gives the complete set of the n-heptane conversion results that were obtained with the zeolite catalysts. With these data and the kinetic equation (Wojciechowski, 1968;Corma et al, 1982)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table II gives the complete set of the n-heptane conversion results that were obtained with the zeolite catalysts. With these data and the kinetic equation (Wojciechowski, 1968;Corma et al, 1982)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the catalyst/oil ratio is the parameter with the largest influence on the cracking reaction. The temperature effect is surprisingly low in the measured range of 698−798 K. The calculated value of C in eq 4 corresponds to an appearent overall activation energy for the cracking reaction of 25 kJ, which does not agree with a doubling of the rate constant per 20 °C temperature increase as measured by Corma et al We have no explanation of this discrepancy, but the catalytic cracking is a complex reaction and the MAT test may be influenced by experimental artifacts.
4 Fit between measured and modeled values for the gas yield ( G y ).
5 Fit between measured and modeled values for (C 1 + C 2 )/(C 3 + C 4 ).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Using the procedures described above, initial selectivities in cumene cracking were determined at a variety of temperatures on various catalysts [56][57][58]2]. Table VI shows a set of selectivlties obtained on LaY and HY at three temperatures, together with product-type identification.…”
Section: The Reactions In Ciymene Crackingmentioning
confidence: 99%