Some Implications of the Philosophy of Technology for Science, Technology and Society (STS) Studies

Abstract

Technology is frequently considered in terms of its impact on entities outside its essential nature: as the impact of technology on the environment and society, but also the impact of human values and needs on technology. By taking particular social implications of technology into account, the Science-Technology relationship can be extended to the field of Science, Technology and Society (STS) studies. STS studies are grounded in socio-technological understanding, that is, systematic knowledge of the mutual relationship between technical objects, the natural environment and social practice. Because technology is a key element of STS, it is expected that the philosophy of technology will have implications for STS studies. The dynamic nature of technology as such leaves its own philosophy in a tentative or flexible state. However, the implications of the philosophy of technology, being in a development phase at the moment with changes in emphasis occuring, for STS studies ought to be determined continuously. The aim of the article is to identify and discuss possible implications of the the philosophy of technology for STS. In order to deduce these implications, the relevant theoretical framework underpinning the article will be discussed in broad outlines. Seeing that the philosophy of technology is such a wide field a delineation of the field needs to be done. Mitcham's proposed preliminary framework is taken as point of departure for the article. Technology as knowledge (epistemology/theory of knowledge) and technology as activity (design methodology) will be discussed as two key aspects of the modern philosophy of technology which could provide implications for STS. A theory of knowledge usually includes methodology, but seeing that Mitcham classified methodology as one of the modes in which technology is manifested, it is dealt with separately. The epistemology and methodology of technology will each be discussed from a philosophical, historical and practicebased methodological perspective. Some implications of the philosophy for STS are identified and discussed.

Evaluation of a Design Principle for Fostering Students’ Epistemological Views on Models and Modelling Using Authentic Practices as Contexts for Learning in Chemistry Education

“…In contrast, the value-loaded interest leads scientists to prefer one theory or model over another independently of considerations of Lenk (2003) argues that Giere's combination of scientific models and their relation to real systems needs to be extended with a action-theoretical interpretation to account for the insoluble interconnection between knowledge, experimenting and action. Such view also covers technological approaches, since technology can be seen as an complex interaction between understanding and acting, requiring conceptual, procedural and methodological knowledge, expertise, skills and information (Ankiewicz and De Swardt, 2006). The type of understanding differs from the analytical understanding endorsed in science (Cajas, 1999).…”

Blockchain futures: With or without Bitcoin?

“…Crucially, the tone adopted within promissory discourse can set expectations for decades to come, skewing paradigm development while also influencing investment decisions, policy‐making, and public perception, beyond laboratory walls, setting in motion “path‐dependent processes” that resist diversion (Borup et al, : 286; Van Lente, ). The results are solutions designed for problems that we may yet have to appreciate in sufficient depth or scope (Ankiewicz & de Swardt, ; Borup et al, ; Brown & Michael, ; Scharff and Dusek, ; Tutton, , ).…”

Technological education challenge: an European perspective

“…If the subject of Technological Education is introduced in the curriculum, then, students can develop the study of this subject further in vocational learning institutes or in high school. The scholastic discipline of Technology-as it is generally called -invites a critical reflection on the technological world (Flick, 1992;Williams & Stables, 2017) and promotes a better understanding and heightened intelligibility of the technological environment (Ankiewicz, 2015;Ritz & Martin, 2013).…”

“…This variability in curricular approaches can be attributed to the lack of a global reference point which resides in the present academic discipline (Ankiewicz, De Swards, & de Vries, 2006). This discipline still lacks a clear internationally agreed identity and a substantial disciplinary educational research and teaching base (Mawson, 2007;Rauscher, 2011).…”