2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2003.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some inequalities for p-variations of martingales

Abstract: Some known inequalities concerning p-variations and conditional p-variations for discrete parameter martingales are sharpened and carried over in the more general context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We establish them by comdininig the techniques from the theory of function spaces and the sharp inequalities in probability. It should be said that the results in [1,5,6,10,11,12,16,20,24] do not just give some sharpened inequalities in probability, but they also provide substantial contributions on extending those probability inequalities to exponential Orlicz spaces. This method was also used in [2,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We establish them by comdininig the techniques from the theory of function spaces and the sharp inequalities in probability. It should be said that the results in [1,5,6,10,11,12,16,20,24] do not just give some sharpened inequalities in probability, but they also provide substantial contributions on extending those probability inequalities to exponential Orlicz spaces. This method was also used in [2,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to apply the extrapolation property, we need a precise estimate for the best constants involved in the Rosenthal inequalities and the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities on Lebesgue spaces. There were a huge amount of efforts paid for estimating the best constants in the Rosenthal inequalities, the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities and some other inequalities in probability on Lebesgue spaces, see [1,5,6,10,11,12,16,20,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%