2005
DOI: 10.1155/aaa.2005.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some more recent results concerning weak Asplund spaces

Abstract: In this paper, we will present some of the latest advances that have occurred in the study of weak Asplund spaces. In particular, we will give an example of a Gâteaux differentiability space that is not weak Asplund

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, let us stress the fact that the two notions are actually distinct, as it was first proved in [57]. Let us also refer to [55] for a simplified proof of the example and to [36,39,41,56] for related results.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, let us stress the fact that the two notions are actually distinct, as it was first proved in [57]. Let us also refer to [55] for a simplified proof of the example and to [36,39,41,56] for related results.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We will consider this space endowed with the total variation norm, i.e., for each α ∈ BV A [0, 1], A more detailed analysis of Proposition 1 may be found in [9,Theorem 7]. Next, we give some technical results that will be needed in our main theorem.…”
Section: A Weakly Stegall Space That Is Not Weak Asplundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this manuscript was first submitted in 2002, a simplified proof of Corollary 2 has appeared in [8].…”
Section: Note Added In Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, uncountable subsets of R that do not contain any perfect compact subsets played an important role in the construction of (i) a Gâteaux differentiability space that is not weak Asplund [13,14,27,29,30], (ii) a dual differentiation space that does not admit an equivalent locally uniformly rotund norm [22] and (iii) a Namioka space without an equivalent Kadeč norm [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%