2001
DOI: 10.1021/jp0046086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some New Classical and Semiclassical Models for Describing Tunneling Processes with Real-Valued Classical Trajectories

Abstract: A model for describing barrier tunneling (or other classically forbidden processes) using purely real-valued classical trajectories is presented. The basic idea is to introduce an auxiliary degree of freedom that allows for fluctuations in the potential-energy surface for the original classical degrees of freedom. The model can be applied purely classically or better semiclassically (e.g., via the initial value representation). Numerical results for 1D barrier tunneling are presented to illustrate the model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[132,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153] Tunneling effects can also not be described with surface hopping although there exist several approaches to alleviate this deficiency, see, for example, Refs. [154][155][156][157][158].…”
Section: Dynamics Simulations Of Intersystem Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[132,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153] Tunneling effects can also not be described with surface hopping although there exist several approaches to alleviate this deficiency, see, for example, Refs. [154][155][156][157][158].…”
Section: Dynamics Simulations Of Intersystem Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter effect can be partially mitigated using so-called decoherence corrections; the interested reader is referred to the according literature. 132,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153] Tunneling effects can also not be described with surface hopping although there exist several approaches to alleviate this deficiency, see, e.g., references [154][155][156][157][158] .…”
Section: Dynamics Simulations Of Intersystem Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Although it is sometimes possible to overcome this difficulty by an analysis which provides optimal values for the parameters, 7 this approach has been implemented only for the one-dimensional ͑1D͒ Eckart potential and its application to more general systems seems difficult. A number of additional ways to describe tunneling within the framework of HK-like approximations have been proposed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] but, in most cases, it is not clear whether they are sufficiently general and numerically efficient for the practical treatment of tunneling in multidimensional systems in the absence of thermal averaging.…”
Section: Tunneling In Two-dimensional Systems Using a Higher-order Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general and popular alternative to quantum scattering approaches is the quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) method. This approach may provide nearly quantitative results if semiclassically corrected to account for possible quantum effects such as, mainly, (i) tunneling, (ii) nonadiabatic transitions, or (iii) the quantization of internal product motions, approximately achieved by means of Gaussian binning (GB). As compared with quantum scattering calculations, QCT calculations are very friendly. Moreover, they allow the study of polyatomic reactions in full-dimensionality. Last but not least, the QCT method is a powerful tool for revealing reaction mechanisms. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%