2009
DOI: 10.1080/00222930902894096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some new Korean Megascolecoid earthworms (Oligochaeta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amynthas conferticurtus Hong & James, 2009: 1241 appears to be misdescribed in several key characters: e.g., the spermathecal pores are said to be on 7 and 8 (thus allegedly qualifying for an A. pomellus species group; however, they are shown in their fig. 7 Blakemore (2012d).…”
Section: Amynthas Phaselus Phaselusmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Amynthas conferticurtus Hong & James, 2009: 1241 appears to be misdescribed in several key characters: e.g., the spermathecal pores are said to be on 7 and 8 (thus allegedly qualifying for an A. pomellus species group; however, they are shown in their fig. 7 Blakemore (2012d).…”
Section: Amynthas Phaselus Phaselusmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4) Remarks. Despite Blakemore (2003a;2003b;2008a) showing that Michaelsen's taxon belonged in Metaphire rather than Amynthas, it was retained in the latter genus by Hong & Kim (2005) and Hong & James (2009: 1255. However, Song & Paik (1969: 15, tab.…”
Section: Megascolecidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarks. Part of a cosmopolitan Amynthas corticis species-complex sensu Blakemore (2002;2010b;2012d) wherein it is fully described with its many synonyms including Perichaeta heteropoda Goto & Hatai, 1898 that is still quoted as a valid taxon from Korea by Hong & Kim (2005) and Hong & James (2009: 1255. Amynthas sangumburi Hong & Kim, 2002 is a probable new synonym (Blakemore 2013), provisionally retained as herein pending further research by its original author (Y. Hong pers.…”
Section: Megascolecidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the species mentioned above, A. chiakensis Hong & James, 2013, was compared with Amynthas sonjaesiki Hong & James, 2009 and also with Amynthas sanchongensis Hong & James, 2001 in the primary literature (Hong & James 2013). However, comparisons between the latter two species, A. sonjaesiki and A. sanchongensis, have never been made.…”
Section: On a Hitherto Undetected Species Group In Amynthasmentioning
confidence: 99%