1968
DOI: 10.1177/004051756803800808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some New Observations on the Effects of Mild Shrinkproofing Treatments on Wool Fibers

Abstract: When wool fibers which have been shrinkproofed by either the KMnO 4 /salt process or a dry chlorination process are examined with the optical microscope, normally, very little effect of the treatment can be seen. However, if they are straightened for the examination, a number of differences between treated and control fibers can easily be seen, especially if water is present. The principal effects are that the scales on the treated fibers, but not on the untreated, become less prominent as the fibers are strai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This investigation provided the first unequivocal evidence that dye does, in fact, enter the wool fiber between cuticle cells, and also showed that dye diffuses along the nonkeratinous endocuticle and CMC early in the dyeing cycle. The above finding supports the view that the cuticle (Makinson, 1968), probably the highly crosslinked A-layer of the exocuticle (Hampton & Rattee, 1979;Baumann & Setiawan, 1985), is a barrier to dye penetration, in that dyes are directed to the gaps between the scales in order to reach the cortex. It appears, however, that lipids present at the intercellular junctions are also a barrier to the diffusion of dyes into the nonkeratinous regions of the CMC (Leeder et al, 1985a).…”
Section: Fig 1 Diffusion Pathways For Dyes Into Woolsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This investigation provided the first unequivocal evidence that dye does, in fact, enter the wool fiber between cuticle cells, and also showed that dye diffuses along the nonkeratinous endocuticle and CMC early in the dyeing cycle. The above finding supports the view that the cuticle (Makinson, 1968), probably the highly crosslinked A-layer of the exocuticle (Hampton & Rattee, 1979;Baumann & Setiawan, 1985), is a barrier to dye penetration, in that dyes are directed to the gaps between the scales in order to reach the cortex. It appears, however, that lipids present at the intercellular junctions are also a barrier to the diffusion of dyes into the nonkeratinous regions of the CMC (Leeder et al, 1985a).…”
Section: Fig 1 Diffusion Pathways For Dyes Into Woolsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…After exhaustion of the KMnO,,, the manganese dioxide deposited on the wool was removed with sodium bisulphite. When applied to fabric, this procedure has been shown [7] to give a low level of resistance to felting, with a shrinkage-reduction factor of about 3.4.…”
Section: Shrinkproofing Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epicuticle is not normall disrupted [8,10,13). If the increase in softening is only slight, its principal effect is to increase the friction of the fibers, reducing their mobility and so reducing their feltability to a limited extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the increase in softening is considerable, it has the additional effect of reducing the difference between against-scale and with-scale friction; this reduces the tendency of the fibers to migrate continuously in one direction during washing, and it can confer a considerably higher degree of resistance to felting. The lower level of softening can be achieved simply by oxidation [10); the relation between the chemical and physical changes appears to be that scission of disulphide bonds makes the molecular chains more mobile, and increased absorption of water by the newly introduced charged groups plasticizes the protein. The higher level of softening can be achieved if the oxidizing agent is chlorine [11 J; the relation between the chemical and physical changes appears to be that the molecular fragments produced by chlorine, although of a fairly high molecular weight, are soluble in water because of their high content of sulphonic and sulphinic groups, but are mostly too large, after mild chlorination, to diffuse out through the epicuticle [8, 1 i~.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%