Chlorine is considerably more effective than other oxidizing agents in reducing the felting power of wool. Explanations have previously been advanced in terms of either the chemical or the physical effects of the treatments. The two approaches can be linked by considering how the different chemical reactions produce modified cuticle cells which have different water-sorptive capacities and, consequently, are softened to different degrees in water. ' Perusal of the literature on degradative antifelting (shrinkproofing) treatments of wool, and consideration of industrial practice, show that many oxidizing agents are able to confer some degree of resistance to felting, but that a high resistance, sufficient to make the wool almost unshrinkable in severe wash tests, can only be obtained when the oxidizing agent is chlorine. It has also been shown specifically that the presence of chloride ions can increase the effectiveness of an oxidative treatment provided the chloride ions can be oxidized to chlorine under the conditions of the treatment [1~, 15]. The reason for this greater effectiveness of chlorine is not immediately obvious; the microscopic appearance of the wool fibers after a highly effective chlorination may not be much different from that after a less effective treatment with, for example, potassium permanganate. Explanations have been advanced in terms of the chemistry of the reactions and, independently, in terms of the physical effects of the treatments, but the two approaches have not been adequately related to each other, as is necessary for a complete explanation. An attempt will be made here to relate the chemical and physical approaches. ' The principal chemical effect of oxidative shrinkproofing treatments is scission and oxidation of the disulphide bond of cystine, with the formation of negatively-charged sulphonic and sulphinic acid groups (and S-sulphonic groups if the fibers are after-treated with bisulphite) [16,19,20]. Many of the treatments also oxidize tyrosine and methionine residues [1, 2J.Precautions are usually taken to confine the reaction to the cuticle of the wool fibers. Attack on cystine is of major importance in the exocuticle, where the molar proportions of cystine, tyrosine, and methionine are 20°J'o, 2%, and 0.16% respectively E4], but attack on tyrosine is equally important in the endocuticle, where the proportions are 3%, 3.6%, and 0.8% respectively [4~. Alexander, Carter, and Earland [1~ and Earland [5,6] suggested that attack at points additional to the cystine residue, most probably at the tyrosine, was essential if any shrinkproofing effect were to be obtained, and that this attack must involve rupture of the protein chain. Present knowledge suggests that this hypothesis is correct in principle, but overstated. A limited degree of resistance to felting can be produced by a wide range of oxidative reagents which cause no such rupture, and some of which do not even oxidize tyrosine E2], but for a high level of shrinkproofing cleavage of the protein chain appears to be...