2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4799936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some new results about the massless Dirac operator

Abstract: In this paper, we give a method to construct the zero mode and zero resonance of the massless Dirac operator H = α · D + Q(x) and obtain some special examples to show the sharpness of some existing results. On the other hand, we extend the previous results of H about the vanishing properties of the zero mode and the existence of the zero resonance. In Sec. IV, we consider the local version and get some improvements and extensions. C 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the confinement of Dirac-like particles in 1D potentials is the subject of considerable recent attention from the applied mathematics community [41][42][43][44]. Our results here, using two explicit toy models of nonintegrable potentials, provide a complementary approach both more accessible to physicists and closer to experimental reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the confinement of Dirac-like particles in 1D potentials is the subject of considerable recent attention from the applied mathematics community [41][42][43][44]. Our results here, using two explicit toy models of nonintegrable potentials, provide a complementary approach both more accessible to physicists and closer to experimental reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We remark that Saitō -Umeda [6] and Zhong -Gao [7] have proven the following result under the same assumption |Q(x)| ≤ C x −ρ , ρ > 1 (In [6], it is assumed ρ > 3/2, however, arguments of [6] go through under the assumption ρ > 1 as was made explicit in [7]): If f satisfies f ∈ L 2,−s (R 3 ) for some 0 < s ≤ min{3/2, ρ − 1} and Hf = 0 in the sense of distributions, then f ∈ H 1 (R 3 ). Our theorem improves over the results of [6] and [7] by weakening the assumption f ∈ L 2,−s (R 3 ) to L 2,−3/2 (R 3 ), which is ρ > 1 independent, and by strengthening the result f ∈ H 1 (R 3 ) to a sharp decay estimate x µ f ∈ H 1 (R 3 ), µ < 1/2. We briefly explain the significance of the theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(iii) As mentioned in Remark 2.3, the absence of zero-energy resonances is wellknown in the three-dimensional case n = 3, see [7], [12,Sect. 4.4], [13], [16], [67], [68], [78]. In fact, for n = 3 the absence of zero-energy resonances has been shown under the weaker decay [7].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is consistent with observations in [7], [12,Sect. 4.4], [13], [16], [67], [68], [78] for n = 3 (see also Remark 3.9 (iii)). This should be contrasted with the behavior of Schrödinger operators where lim z→0 z∈C\{0} 38) "implies" the absence of zero-energy resonances of h = h 0 + v for n ∈ N, n 5, again for sufficiently fast decaying short-range potentials v at infinity, as | • | 2−n lies in L 2 (R n ; d n x) near infinity if and only if n 5, as observed in [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation