Some notes to morphological and bioacoustics characteristics of Cicadatra hyalina (Fabricius, 1798) (Cicadoidea: Cicadidae) according to samples collected from different parts of Turkey

Abstract

Some notes to morphological and bioacoustics characteristics of Cicadatra hyalina (Fabricius, 1798) (Cicadoidea: Cicadidae) according to samples collected from different parts of Turkey Türkiye'nin farklı bölgelerinden toplanan örneklerle Cicadatra hyalina (Fabricius, 1798) (Cicadoidea: Cicadidae)'nın morfoloji ve biyoakustik karakterleriyle ilgili bazı notlar INTRODUCTION Abbas MOL a

A taxonomy based on acoustic features of some Iranian cicadas and calling song description ofChloropsalta smaragdulaHaupt, 1920 (Hem: Cicadidae) from Isfahan, Iran

“…It is repeated regularly, lasting between 640-8952±651ms. Echemes are separated by intervals between 232-704±149 ms. Echemes consist of two connected pulses of 2-3 ms length, separated by intervals between 14-16 ms (Mol 2018).…”

“…Frequency parameters of the calling song are characerized by a wide range with distinct peaks (Popov 1975;Boulard 1995). Mol (2018) measured a frequency range from from 10248 to 16760…”

A New Species of Oligoglena Horváth, 1912 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) from Mediterranean Region of Turkey

“…sirintaylan sp. n. can be differentiated from O. tibialis using the following characters: (i) the pseudoparameres are short, hardly visible, and not extending median lope of uncus (in O tibialis the pseudoparameres are long, divergend and much longer than median lobe of uncus), (ii) pronotal collar, its lateral part, anterior and posterior edge of pronotum yellow (in O. tibialis blackish), (iii) terga 3-7 black with yellowish red borders (in O.tibialis without), (iv) ulnar cell I is 1.5-1.95 times longer than apical cell I in male, 2-2.5 in female (in O. tibialis 1.25-1.42 in male, 0.85-1 in female), (v) hind wings with 5 apical cells in male (in O. tibialis 6), (vi) ovipositor length 4.2-6.2 mm (in O. tibialis 3.93-4.68), and (vii) pygofer inner teeth opposite to claspers (in O. tibialis not opposite) (Gogala & Drosopoulos 2006;Gogala et al, 2017;Mol, 2017).…”

“…Generally according to the results of the morphologically studies conducted at different time intervals, it is shown that 29 species belonging to Cicadidae family are distributions and nine of these are endemic in Turkey (Nast, 1972;Lodos & Kalkandelen, 1981;Duffels & Laan, 1985;Demir, 2007;Önder, Tezcan, Karsavuran, & Zeybekoğlu, 2011;Mol, 2020). Turkey, as well as the use of morphological characteristics of the species in taxonomic studies related to Cicadidae recently characterized, they also began to be used with acoustics characteristics (Zeybekoğlu et al, 2011;Mol, Zeybekoğlu, & Akyürek, 2013;Mol, 2017;2020). Acoustics characteristics are used to appoint the taxonomic intercourse, in addition to that, it has been prospective to differentiate the buddy species and to elucidate the taxonomic status of vernacular populations with petty morphological differences by song patterns among the Cicada species, such as Oligoglena (Gogala, Puissant, & Trilar, 2017;Mol, 2020).…”