Some observations on element performance in isochoric and dilatant plastic flow

Abstract

SUMMARYThe performance of finite elements is scrutinized in isochoric and dilatant/contractant plastic flow. Standard displacement based elements, uniformly and selectively integrated elements, and elements with augmented strain rate fields are considered in plane-strain, axisymmetric and three-dimensional configurations with particular reference to the kinematic constraint imposed by dilatant/contractant plastic flow. It turns out that findings for isochoric deformations do not necessarily carry over to cases with plastic dilatancy or contraction. For the elements with augmented strain rate fields the danger of spurious mechanisms in ideal plasticity is brought out. A particular strategy which augments only the normal strain rates at the expense of a lesser improvement for the bending behaviour does not suffer from the possibility of spurious modes, while preserving the ability to accommodate dilatant/contractant plastic flow. Illustrative examples on planestrain, axisymmetry and three-dimensional structures are included which support the above findings.

Enhanced Assumed Strain Methods for Implicit Gradient‐Enhanced Damage‐Plasticity

“…However, for plasticity models assuming dilatant plastic flow, such as commonly employed for cohesive-frictional materials like concrete or rock, spurious locking phenomena due to kinematic constraints can arise in conjunction with low order finite elements. This issue was observed and discussed in [2] for simple (local) linear-elastic perfectly plastic material models. As a remedy, specific enhanced assumed strain (EAS) methods to enrich the normal strain rate field were proposed and assessed.…”

“…However, for plasticity models with dilatant plastic flow spurious locking phenomena due to certain kinematic constraints can arise in conjunction with low order finite elements. This issue was discussed in [2] in the context of simple linear-elastic perfectly-plastic models. As a remedy, the enhanced assumed strain (EAS) concept [3] was employed and assessed.…”

A non‐linear programming method approach for upper bound limit analysis

“…However, the inequality condition is restricted to plastic strains due to stress states located on the vertex of the yield surface. Thus, if the collapse problem under study is governed by a compressive failure behaviour, the equality condition is always activated and may affect the numerical results with a behaviour analogous to the volumetric locking, as shown in [16] for plane strain problems. Nevertheless, the authors avow from their experience that they never detected cases in which the results were manifestly affected by locking effects when using Mohr-Coulomb or Drucker-Prager materials.…”

New findings on limit state analysis with unstructured triangular finite elements

“…Later, De Borst et al . looked at the bearing capacity problem on frictional material with and without dilation in plane strain and axisymmetric conditions. The authors used structured and unstructured quadrangular meshes together with a variety of finite elements, including standard, Bbar and EAS 4‐node elements as well as various 8‐node and 9‐node elements.…”

“…A group of papers use the element patch in Figure to assess element behavior under plastic flow (De Borst et al . for quadrangles, Heeres et al . for triangles and Askes et al .…”