2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5047886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Opial type inequalities for conformable fractional integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume in additional that r is non-decreasing and r(t) ≤ t for t ≥ 0. If u ∈ C (R + , R + ) satisfies Combine the above inequality with u(t) ≤ k(t) + m(t)z(t) this imply (14). The proof is complete.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assume in additional that r is non-decreasing and r(t) ≤ t for t ≥ 0. If u ∈ C (R + , R + ) satisfies Combine the above inequality with u(t) ≤ k(t) + m(t)z(t) this imply (14). The proof is complete.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…If we take (t) = 0 in Theorem 3.1, then Theorem 3.1 reduces to Theorem 4 which has been proved by Sarikaya in [14]. Theorem 3.4.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This completes the proof. This inequality (2.16) is just a two-dimensional generalization of the following inequality which was established in [21]:…”
Section: Second Proof Letmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, some new Opial's inequalities for the conformable fractional integrals have been established (see [19][20][21][22]). In the paper, we introduce two new concepts of Katugampola conformable partial derivatives and α-conformable integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%