2011
DOI: 10.1080/01966324.2011.10737797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Optimality Issues in Estimating Two-Stage Optional Randomized Response Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Gupta et al (2010;2011), it was observed that introduction of T into the Gupta et al (2006) model doesn't always decrease the variance of mean estimator. In order to reduce this variance, T should be chosen carefully.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Gupta et al (2010;2011), it was observed that introduction of T into the Gupta et al (2006) model doesn't always decrease the variance of mean estimator. In order to reduce this variance, T should be chosen carefully.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The following theorem compares the variances of the two two-stage models under the assumption that the scrambling variables of both the models have the same mean and the same variance. In Gupta et al (2011), it was observed that for questions with small sensitivity level, any value of T would make the Gupta et al (2010) model perform better than the Gupta et al (2006) model, but for questions with larger sensitivity level, a larger value of T was needed, which is not recommended as it affects respondent cooperation. So instead of using a large value of T, one should rather opt for the new two-stage model.…”
Section: Model For Various Values Of F and Wmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations