1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf00351637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some peculiar features of the hydrochemical regime and the fauna of mesohaline waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tolerance of sichel to water salinity is similar to that demonstrated by spined loach, bream or carp, for which the water salinity of 5–6 ppt is the upper ecophysiological limit to the development of eggs (Chlebovic ; Klinkhardt & Winkler ). In view of the above, it seems likely that there are some specific regional adaptations among sichel populations to reproduction in water of higher salinity (9.7–10.6), such as for example in the Aral Sea (Goteeva & Markova ; Rass ) or else the sichel inhabiting that water body migrates to rivers during the spawning season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The tolerance of sichel to water salinity is similar to that demonstrated by spined loach, bream or carp, for which the water salinity of 5–6 ppt is the upper ecophysiological limit to the development of eggs (Chlebovic ; Klinkhardt & Winkler ). In view of the above, it seems likely that there are some specific regional adaptations among sichel populations to reproduction in water of higher salinity (9.7–10.6), such as for example in the Aral Sea (Goteeva & Markova ; Rass ) or else the sichel inhabiting that water body migrates to rivers during the spawning season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The Baltic was thought to be a species-poor water body because the average surface-water salinity in the Baltic Sea proper is 5 to 8 -a critical level at which sharp changes in the ionic composition of seawater diluted with freshwater occur (Khlebovich 1968). Khlebovich (1969) argued that these ionic changes constitute a physico-chemical barrier between marine and freshwater faunas, and Kinne (1971) coined the name 'horohalinicum' (from the Greek 'horos': limit, boundary line) for this specific salinity range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deaton & Greenberg (1986) stated that species abundance declined to a minimum between salinity 5 and 8 not only in estuaries, but in all bodies of brackish water. Those authors re-examined the hydrochemical data used by Khlebovich (1968) and found that, in fact, while the ionic composition of diluted seawater changed slightly between salinity 5 and 8, the changes in ionic ratios below salinity 2 were much larger; thus it was concluded that the proposed physico-chemical barrier did not exist only between salinity 5 and 8. The latter finding fits well with the idea of plurality of barrier salinity zones and the existence of the specific 'δ-horohalinicum' at salinity 0.5 to 2.0 (Aladin 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates rather stronger species-specific than familyspecific adaptations to salinity. Chlebovic (1968, cited by Klinkhardt & Winkler, 1989 stated that a salinity of 5-6‰ acts as a general ecophysiological barrier for the development of freshwater fish eggs. Cobitis taenia reaches the upper limit of this range which corresponds to the tolerances of bream, carp and pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%