2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13122313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Peculiarities of Arable Soil Organic Matter Detection Using Optical Remote Sensing Data

Abstract: Optical remote sensing only provides information about the very thin surface layer of soil. Rainfall splash alters soil surface properties and its spectral reflectance. We analyzed the impact of rainfall on the success of soil organic matter (SOM) content (% by mass) detection and mapping based on optical remote sensing data. The subject of the study was the arable soils of a test field located in the Tula region (Russia), their spectral reflectance, and Sentinel-2 data. Our research demonstrated that rainfall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) Limitation of soil surface conditions: A recent study by Prudnikova et al [82] demonstrated that rainfall negatively affected the accuracy of SOM predictions based on Sentinel-2 data. Accordingly, we conclude that there is a need for minimization of the effect of soil surface variations in large-scale satellite data.…”
Section: Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Limitation of soil surface conditions: A recent study by Prudnikova et al [82] demonstrated that rainfall negatively affected the accuracy of SOM predictions based on Sentinel-2 data. Accordingly, we conclude that there is a need for minimization of the effect of soil surface variations in large-scale satellite data.…”
Section: Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging spectra are the most important data source, and their characteristic response to soil chemical composition is an important foundation for hyperspectral remote sensing-based SOM content prediction [18][19][20]. However, imaging spectra are not affected by soil composition alone but comprehensively reflect the soil physical properties and chemical composition within the ground sample, and soil physical properties and chemical composition exert a coupling effect on the response to the spectrum [21][22][23]. Research has shown that the scattering contribution of soil physical properties, such as soil moisture (SM) and surface roughness properties (e.g., root mean squared height, RMSH), to spectral reflectance seriously affects the sensitivity of the hyperspectral data to the SOM content [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important dyeing material of the soil, SOM can significantly absorb the incident light in the visible-light band, or even the short-wave infrared band, and there is usually a significant negative correlation between its content and the soil spectral reflectance. However, imaging spectra are not affected by the soil composition alone but comprehensively reflect the soil physical properties and chemical composition within the ground sample, and the soil physical properties and chemical composition exert a coupling effect on the response to the spectrum [21][22][23]. Previous studies on SOM prediction lack consideration of soil physical properties, ignoring the spectral response of soil physical properties, such as soil moisture (SM), soil bulk weight (SBW), and surface roughness properties (e.g., root-mean-square height, RMSH), resulting in poor accuracy and poor spatiotemporal transferability of SOM prediction models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%