2014
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5206-4.ch016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some People Aren’t People on the Inside

Abstract: So-called alternative online niche communities are prone to ridicule, derision, and dismissal owing to the challenges they pose to prevailing onto-normativities, those ingrained modes of thought that dictate how we describe reality. Relying on the divergent approaches of classic SWOT analysis and post-structuralist philosophy and queer theory, this chapter explores how online connectivity shapes expressions of one niche community, the Otherkin. Otherkin are conceived as flows of desire, difference, and becomin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Despite manifold differences in specific identity claims, all Otherkin understand themselves to be deeply, unchangeably, other-than-human. Current scholarly work tends to view Otherkinity in one of three ways: as a religious belief system based in fictional works (Kirby 2008(Kirby , 2013O'Callaghan 2015;Davidsen 2013Davidsen , 2016Cusack 2016); as a neurological abnormality or pathological disorder (Gerbasi et al 2008;Probyn-Rapsey 2011;Grivell, Clegg, and Roxburgh 2014); or as a community-based formation of selfknowledge infused with mythological and pop-cultural influences (Laycock 2012;Robertson 2012Robertson , 2013Johnston 2013;Shane 2014). Having spent a great deal of time doing fieldwork with Otherkin, I have come to regard the phenomenon from more of an ontological position-that is, I understand their Otherkinity as deriving from an initial experience of other-than-humanness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Despite manifold differences in specific identity claims, all Otherkin understand themselves to be deeply, unchangeably, other-than-human. Current scholarly work tends to view Otherkinity in one of three ways: as a religious belief system based in fictional works (Kirby 2008(Kirby , 2013O'Callaghan 2015;Davidsen 2013Davidsen , 2016Cusack 2016); as a neurological abnormality or pathological disorder (Gerbasi et al 2008;Probyn-Rapsey 2011;Grivell, Clegg, and Roxburgh 2014); or as a community-based formation of selfknowledge infused with mythological and pop-cultural influences (Laycock 2012;Robertson 2012Robertson , 2013Johnston 2013;Shane 2014). Having spent a great deal of time doing fieldwork with Otherkin, I have come to regard the phenomenon from more of an ontological position-that is, I understand their Otherkinity as deriving from an initial experience of other-than-humanness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%