1959
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.54.3.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some phase relations in the hydrothermally altered rocks of porphyry copper deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good example for this can be found in porphyry copper deposit systems (Creasey 1959). In this context, the alteration mineral assemblages or the defined zones in porphyry copper systems have been classified using a specific terminology: potassic, phyllic, argillic, and propylitic types.…”
Section: Classification Of Hydrothermal Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good example for this can be found in porphyry copper deposit systems (Creasey 1959). In this context, the alteration mineral assemblages or the defined zones in porphyry copper systems have been classified using a specific terminology: potassic, phyllic, argillic, and propylitic types.…”
Section: Classification Of Hydrothermal Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modem approach to classifying alteration types in terms of mineral assemblages, first devised by Creasey (1959), has been developed to a large extent from many studies on porphyry copper deposits. A simple classification scheme is to designate an alteration type by the most abundant or most obvious mineral in the altered rock: for example, sericitization, dolomitization, chloritization, silicification, 122 CHAPTER 3 etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be broadly grouped, following Creasey (1959, andin Titley andHicks, 1966), as propylitic, potassic, and quartzsericite types. Many of the altered rocks, however, do not conveniently fit into these groupings because of the presence of metastable or unstable mineral phases or because of the lack of diagnostic minerals in the sampled rocks.…”
Section: Altered Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%