1955
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1955.tb42530.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Purified Poliomyelitis Virus Preparations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1
1

Year Published

1958
1958
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, the sedimentation coefficient of a 0.02 per cent suspension of purified MEF poliomyelitis virus particles is given by SCHWERDT and ScHAFFER (1955) as 154X 10-3 cmfsecfdynefgm. Assuming for Col SK virus a molecular weight of 10 million (which corresponds roughly with a sedimentation constant of 130 S), the high infectivity-protein ratio of the purified preparations leads to the conclusion that something of the order of 100 molecules represents one infectious dose.…”
Section: Morphology Of Virus (Electronmicroscopy Ultrafiltration Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, the sedimentation coefficient of a 0.02 per cent suspension of purified MEF poliomyelitis virus particles is given by SCHWERDT and ScHAFFER (1955) as 154X 10-3 cmfsecfdynefgm. Assuming for Col SK virus a molecular weight of 10 million (which corresponds roughly with a sedimentation constant of 130 S), the high infectivity-protein ratio of the purified preparations leads to the conclusion that something of the order of 100 molecules represents one infectious dose.…”
Section: Morphology Of Virus (Electronmicroscopy Ultrafiltration Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative contrast electron microscopy of this fraction revealed IGV like those shown in figure IB. Since reovirus has a sedimentation coefficient of 630S and poliovirus of 160S, our calculated sedimentation coefficient of IGV lies between 520 and 530S [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years methods have been developed for the concentration of polio virus from large volumes of tissue culture fluids (Schwerdt & Schaffer, 1955) but in this case the very favourable stability properties of the virus have enabled co-precipitation with the proteins of the medium at pH 4.0-4.5 to be used as an initial concentration step. The extreme lability of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease a t low pH values precludes the use of this method, and the methods a t present being used for the concentration of this virus (precipitation with ammonium sulphate, ethanol or acetone after deproteinization with chloroform, Pyl & Rohrer, 1955 ; or protamine, Hansen & Holm, 1950 ; and ultracentrifugation) although useful for concentration from sources of low volume are not well suited for use on a large scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%