2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2006.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some physical properties of sugarbeet seed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2 , respectively. The results reported by many researchers (Çalýþýr et al, 2005;Dursun et al, 2007;Sacilik et al, 2003;Yalçýn, 2007;Yalçýn et al, 2007) show that the terminal velocity of several seeds increased as the moisture content increased, supporting our results. On the other hand, the terminal velocity values for cv.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 , respectively. The results reported by many researchers (Çalýþýr et al, 2005;Dursun et al, 2007;Sacilik et al, 2003;Yalçýn, 2007;Yalçýn et al, 2007) show that the terminal velocity of several seeds increased as the moisture content increased, supporting our results. On the other hand, the terminal velocity values for cv.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The seed samples were kept in a refrigerator at 5°C, sealed in separate plastic bags for two weeks to enable the moisture to distribute uniformly throughout the sample. For all tests, the seeds were allowed to warm up to room temperature (Dursun et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating the projected area of castor-oil fruits submitted to drying at 40 °C temperature, Goneli et al (2008) observed an approximate variation from 391 to 259 mm 2 , with the moisture content reduction from 2.5 to 0.13 (decimal d.b.). The reduction in the projected area as a function of the reduction in the moisture content has also been observed for other grains (Aydin, 2007;Dursun et al, 2007;Yalçin et al, 2007). The reduction in the moisture content increased the surface/volume ratio, under the six conditions analyzed (Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This trend can be explained by the fact that safflower grains suffer reduction in their characteristic dimensions during the drying process (Table 1). The reduction in the projected area during the drying for agricultural products has been observed by many authors for various products (Dursun et al, 2007;Guedes et al, 2011;Siqueira et al, 2012b;Araujo et al, 2014). The surface area of safflower grains decreased along the drying process, as illustrated in Figure 4A, a trend also observed for peanut grains (Araujo et al, 2014), jatropha fruits (Siqueira et al, 2012b), melon seeds (Bande et al, 2012) and rice grains (Kibar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%