Some Potential “Pitfalls” in the Construction of Educational Systematic Reviews

Coverdale, John; Roberts, Laura Weiss; Beresin, Eugene V.; Louie, Alan K.; Brenner, Adam M.; Balon, Richard

doi:10.1007/s40596-017-0675-7

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Referencing well is not necessarily equivalent to providing an exhaustive reference list, unless the article qualifies as a systematic or scoping review [8]. Instead, some summary comments about the related key literature may suffice.…”

Section: Omission Of Important Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Practical Advice for Preventing Problems When Referencing the Literature

Coverdale,

Aggarwal,

Balon

et al. 2023

Acad Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Omission Of Important Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Academic Psychiatry has published several resources about writing and publishing for authors [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and about reviewing [11,12] in editorials and columns. It has not, however, addressed the topic of processes related to optimizing the provision of referencing in academic publications.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Practical Advice for Preventing Problems When Referencing the Literature

Coverdale,

Aggarwal,

Balon

et al. 2023

Acad Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Systematic reviews are an established practice in social sciences because they show to academics significant and reliable research findings (what we know, what is not known and how can we know) in the subject studied, and they help to policymakers and practitioners to discover what works, how it works and what might do harm in practice (Gough et al, 2017). Systematic reviews with a focused question, a defined search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria and critical appraisal strategies are hard to do well; however, they are an important educational resource and reveal the maturity of a scientific field (Coverdale et al, 2017). A mixed-methods systematic review is a type of review focused on the analysis and integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence, which provides a more complete basis for decision-making (Stern et al, 2020).…”

Section: Rationalementioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Competences for Improving Digital Inclusion in E-Government Services: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol

Morte-Nadal

Esteban-Navarro

2022

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The e-government requires citizens that have a certain level of digital skills. Contact restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the digital transformation of Public Administration in most countries and has increased the social digital divide. Therefore, the training of citizens in digital competences is one of the main challenges of the knowledge society. This mixed-methods systematic review protocol aims to synthesize quantitative and qualitative findings about conditioning factors of digital inclusion, in a multidimensional perspective, related with the education, healthcare and welfare sectors and the political actions involved to improve the digital competences of citizenship for allowing and enhancing their interactions with these online public services. The protocol has been written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Nine databases including Web of Science, Scopus, Educational Resources Information Center Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA), ProQuest, MEDLINE, PubMed, SocINDEX and Cairn.info will be searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 2011 or later. Grey literature and citation chaining will be undertaken. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies will be included. Data items will be extracted and coded in a standardized format. A convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration will be used. The results will be of interest to educational policymakers who want to take into account citizens’ digital skills in the design of online services and lifelong learning programs.

show abstract

“…Boland et al 2017), potential challenges (even though mentioned in the literature) take shape only in the actual execution of a review. Coverdale et al (2017) describe some of the challenges that we encountered from a journal editor's point of view. They summarize them as follows:…”

Section: Systematic Review Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

2020

179

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

show abstract

Some Potential “Pitfalls” in the Construction of Educational Systematic Reviews

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

Practical Advice for Preventing Problems When Referencing the Literature

Practical Advice for Preventing Problems When Referencing the Literature

Digital Competences for Improving Digital Inclusion in E-Government Services: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About