2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some practical considerations for linearity assessment of calibration curves as function of concentration levels according to the fitness-for-purpose approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, colorimetric studies were conducted to evaluate the surfactant release under the evaluated conditions as indirect measurement. For this, a calibration curve of absorbance versus concentration was obtained for each surfactant at a fixed wavelength of 200 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [ 62 ]. The amount of released surfactant was estimated in the supernatant by absorbance measurements after 24 h of stirring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, colorimetric studies were conducted to evaluate the surfactant release under the evaluated conditions as indirect measurement. For this, a calibration curve of absorbance versus concentration was obtained for each surfactant at a fixed wavelength of 200 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [ 62 ]. The amount of released surfactant was estimated in the supernatant by absorbance measurements after 24 h of stirring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linearity is a requirement with OLS but it is not correct to assume that all calibration curves are linear. Different procedures for assessing linearity of a calibration, such as graphical plots, statistical tests and numerical parameters, have been proposed [7,[17][18][19]. Unfortunately, linearity assessment has been subject to different definitions and interpretations, which results in some of these procedures not being equivalent and, sometimes, contradictory results can be obtained.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Goodness-of-fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homoscedasticity of calibration data was tested at 95% confidence level. The regression was selected based on the coefficient of correlation ( r ) and in the cumulative percentage relative error (∑%RE) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workflow of DPS preparation and sample analysis. Blood drawn from venipuncture was used to prepare DPS and wet plasma as well as detecting hematocrit on the coefficient of correlation (r) and in the cumulative percentage relative error (Σ%RE)[31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%