Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy‐makers in natural resource management

Abstract

Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convened to identify practical solutions to improve engagement between these camps. A necessary starting point is that every researcher and policy-maker should understand, and tap into, the motivations and reward systems of the other when seeking engagement. For example, researchers can be motivated to engage in policy development if there is a promise of outputs that align with their reward systems such as co-authored publications. Successful research-policy partnerships are built around personal relationships. As a researcher, you cannot therefore expect your results to inform policy by only publishing in journals. As a policy-maker, you cannot guarantee engagement from researchers by publicly inviting comment on a document. Actively building and maintaining relationships with key individuals through discussions, meetings, workshops or field days will increase the likelihood that research outcomes will inform policy decisions. We identified secondments, sabbaticals, fellowships and 'buddies', an annual national NRM conference and 'contact mapping' (a Facebook-type network) as forums that can catalyse new relationships between researchers and policy-makers. We challenge every researcher, policy-maker and manager in NRM to build one new cross-cultural relationship each year.

Marine Conservation Outcomes are More Likely when Fishers Participate as Citizen Scientists: Case Studies from the Mexican Mesoamerican Reef

“…Whilst research faculty tenure and promotion at most academic institutions are generally dependent on excellence in research, teaching, and service, implementation of research recommendations, including conservation, is generally not linked with job security and advancement. Though some institutions are increasingly valuing service learning and societal contributions in the tenure and promotion process (June 2013), there have traditionally been disincentives within academia for cross-disciplinary research and its applications in conservation (Arlettaz et al 2010, Gibbons et al 2008Knight et al 2008). This is definitely the case in Mexico, where the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) can make substantial contributions to top researchers' incomes based on research productivity, defined in terms of publications and grants (Altbach 2015).…”

Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government

“…There is a need to manage, through negotiation, the boundaries between the producers of knowledge (researchers) and the executors of action (policy-makers) (Van Kerkhoff and Lebel, 2006). It is recommended that researchers and policymakers should understand and take into account into each other's motivations and reward systems (Gibbons et al, 2008). Researchers also need to understand and target the world of institutions, policies and politics (Pierce et al, 2005), as well as the processes of decision-making, behaviour change and value transfer (Reyers et al, 2010).…”

The use of secondments as a tool to increase knowledge translation

“…5 One approach to increasing the interaction or improving the interface between researchers and policy makers is use of secondments. 6,7,8 Secondments have been used in the healthcare setting as a way to bring an individual's expertise to a team, and to develop staff knowledge and skills. Previous research has found that secondments involving researchers and healthcare practitioners are an efficient way to transfer research.…”