1986
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0076065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some problems concerning the equivalences of two systems of differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof, (i) Suppose that x is a solution of (1). Then (by (2), (3), (11) and 12) we have Operator F is defined for every * G K because of (15), and Fx £ X. We shall show that h > 0 can be chosen such that F is a contraction.…”
Section: ( / L( T )M(t) Dr) D S Q(t S) ^ K M(t) T G [T 0 T)mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof, (i) Suppose that x is a solution of (1). Then (by (2), (3), (11) and 12) we have Operator F is defined for every * G K because of (15), and Fx £ X. We shall show that h > 0 can be chosen such that F is a contraction.…”
Section: ( / L( T )M(t) Dr) D S Q(t S) ^ K M(t) T G [T 0 T)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It can be easily seen that (11) where the last inequality is a consequence of (18). By the application of Theorem 1 we conclude that statements (i) and (ii) are valid.…”
Section: Exp (J L(t)ix(t) Drv T E [To T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation