2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some programming models to derive priority weights from additive interval fuzzy preference relation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Li et al [38] pointed out that the definition in [37] was technically deficient and yielded contradictory results for the same judgment matrix after the alternatives are re-labeled. Wang et al [55] put forward a new method with a parameter to obtain priority weights from an FPR, and defined a new definition for additive consistency in an IFPR. Based on the new definition, linear programming models for deriving interval priority weights from both a consistent and an inconsistent IFPR were proposed.…”
Section: Saaty and Vargasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Li et al [38] pointed out that the definition in [37] was technically deficient and yielded contradictory results for the same judgment matrix after the alternatives are re-labeled. Wang et al [55] put forward a new method with a parameter to obtain priority weights from an FPR, and defined a new definition for additive consistency in an IFPR. Based on the new definition, linear programming models for deriving interval priority weights from both a consistent and an inconsistent IFPR were proposed.…”
Section: Saaty and Vargasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to additive or multiplicative transitivity, different prioritization methods have been developed for obtaining an interval-valued priority vector from a complete interval reciprocal comparison matrices such as linear programs (Arbel, 1989;Gou & Wang, 2012;Hu, Ren, Lan, Wang, & Zheng, 2014;Kress, 1991;Wang, Lan, Ren, & Luo, 2012;Xu & Chen, 2008), nonlinear programs (Xia & Xu, 2014), and goal programs (Wang & Elhag, 2007;Wang & Li, 2012;Wang, Yang, & Xu, 2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 5 and the group IARCM. Finally, by putting the foresaid models together, an algorithm is proposed for solving GDM problems with incomplete IARCMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dubois and Prade (2012) pointed out that interval fuzzy values can clearly capture the idea of uncertain and imprecise ratings. Recently, IFPRs have been receiving increasing research interest and application in preference modelling and MCDM analysis (Genç et al 2010;Liu and Zhang 2014;Wang et al 2012;Wang and Chen 2014;Wang and Li 2012a;Xia and Xu 2014;Xu et al 2014a, b;Xu 2011). An important research issue is to elicit priority weights from IFPRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, new additive consistency definitions and priority methods have been put forward for IFPRs. Wang et al (2012) introduced a logarithmic feasible region model to define additively consistent IFPRs. Hu et al (2014) pointed out the drawback of Xu and Chen (2008)'s method and proposed the improved linear programs by setting α = (n−1)/2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%