2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-005-0004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some properties of decorrelation techniques in the ambiguity space

Abstract: are aiming at ambiguity space decorrelation through unimodular transformations. The performances of the two-decorrelation techniques are compared through their ability in making the ambiguity space as orthogonal as possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more information on the LAMBDA method, the reader is referred to Teunissen (1993Teunissen ( , 1995 and de Jonge and Tiberius (1996a) or to the textbooks Hofmann-Wellenhof et al (1997), Strang and Borre (1997), Teunissen and Kleusberg (1998), Misra and Enge (2001). Practical results obtained with it and suggested improvements, can be found, for example, in Boon and Ambrosius (1997), , Chang et al (2005), Cox and Brading (1999), Dai et al (2005), de Jonge and Tiberius (1996b), de Jonge et al (1996), Han (1995), Jonkman (1998), Moenikes et al (2005), Peng et al (1999), Svendsen (2005), Tiberius and de Jonge (1995), Tiberius et al (1997).…”
Section: The Effect Of Improving the Ambiguity Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information on the LAMBDA method, the reader is referred to Teunissen (1993Teunissen ( , 1995 and de Jonge and Tiberius (1996a) or to the textbooks Hofmann-Wellenhof et al (1997), Strang and Borre (1997), Teunissen and Kleusberg (1998), Misra and Enge (2001). Practical results obtained with it and suggested improvements, can be found, for example, in Boon and Ambrosius (1997), , Chang et al (2005), Cox and Brading (1999), Dai et al (2005), de Jonge and Tiberius (1996b), de Jonge et al (1996), Han (1995), Jonkman (1998), Moenikes et al (2005), Peng et al (1999), Svendsen (2005), Tiberius and de Jonge (1995), Tiberius et al (1997).…”
Section: The Effect Of Improving the Ambiguity Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%