1970
DOI: 10.4064/fm-66-1-55-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some properties of the induced map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we will illustrate how to adjust the construction to additionally fulfill property (2) of the statement. We point out that part of the argument below-deriving from exactness that the map h is open-can also be found in [7].…”
Section: The Combinatorics Of Universalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we will illustrate how to adjust the construction to additionally fulfill property (2) of the statement. We point out that part of the argument below-deriving from exactness that the map h is open-can also be found in [7].…”
Section: The Combinatorics Of Universalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Structural exactness is a natural generalization of the well studied notion of exactness. Recall that an amalgamation diagram, as in Definition 5.1, is exact if for every b ∈ B, c ∈ C with f (b) = g(c) there is d ∈ D so that f (d) = b and g (d) = c; see [7]. In the context of Proposition 5.1, structural exactness of C will allow us to strengthen the connectedness properties of the map h. Two-sided structural exactness together with the next property will additionally allow us to control isomorphism type of the fibers of h. Definition 5.2.…”
Section: Corollary 41 (Andersonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since each C i is nondegenerate, we may choose N sufficiently large so that the projection of each component onto Y N is nondegenerate. Since the projection mapping π N is monotone (see[8, Corollary to Theorem 10],[5, Theorem 5]), all pairwise intersections of the three subcontinua π N (C 1 ), π N (C 2 ), and π N (C 3 ) are precisely {π N (r)}. Thus, π N (r) is a ramification point of Y N .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, while the inverse limit of open mappings is not necessarily open, the inverse limit (or even the weakly induced limit in the sense of Mioduszewski [15]) of confluent mappings is always confluent (cf. [9,17,10]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%