2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1252102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Prosodic Characteristics of Repeated Talk following Conversation Repair Requests by Adults with Hearing Impairment

Abstract: When miscommunications occur in conversation, participants have access to both speech-and language-based cues to clarify the miscommunicated talk. This article investigates what changes occur in prosodic speech patterns between initial and repeated talk in a brief free and unstructured conversation between an adult bilateral cochlear implantee and his chosen familiar communication partner, his wife, conducted in a clinical setting. The 23-minute conversation between the two participants included 37 self-repeti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as repeating their talk, audiologists typically used a combination of the following repair strategies: (1) redirecting their gaze to the client; (2) prosodic variation (including increase in loudness or change in pitch) (Lind et al . ); (3) simplifying complex utterances (Schegloff ); (4) omitting ‘dispensable’ elements of the turn (Schegloff ); (5) replacing specialized terms; and (6) providing further explanation or expanding on an indexical (e.g., ‘it’) (Schegloff ). While it was variable which of these strategies were used by audiologists in their repair turns, in all but one case where mutual gaze had not been present during the trouble source turn, the speaker sought to meet the client's gaze within the repair turn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As well as repeating their talk, audiologists typically used a combination of the following repair strategies: (1) redirecting their gaze to the client; (2) prosodic variation (including increase in loudness or change in pitch) (Lind et al . ); (3) simplifying complex utterances (Schegloff ); (4) omitting ‘dispensable’ elements of the turn (Schegloff ); (5) replacing specialized terms; and (6) providing further explanation or expanding on an indexical (e.g., ‘it’) (Schegloff ). While it was variable which of these strategies were used by audiologists in their repair turns, in all but one case where mutual gaze had not been present during the trouble source turn, the speaker sought to meet the client's gaze within the repair turn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, when repairing their talk, conversation partners will often vary the prosodic delivery of their repeated turn (Lind et al . ). For example, speakers may increase the loudness, pitch, and duration of their repair turn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations