1992
DOI: 10.1016/0169-2070(92)90115-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some recent developments in non-linear time series modelling, testing, and forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
1
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
62
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…De Gooijer & Kumar (1992) provided an overview of the developments in this area to the beginning of the 1990s. These authors argued that the evidence for the superior forecasting performance of nonlinear models is patchy.…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Gooijer & Kumar (1992) provided an overview of the developments in this area to the beginning of the 1990s. These authors argued that the evidence for the superior forecasting performance of nonlinear models is patchy.…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a good in-sample fit does not necessarily induce a good out-of-sample forecasting performance (Clements et al 2004). However, several authors did find promising evidence in favor of nonlinear models (e.g., De Gooijer &Kumar 1992 andMaravall 1983). Nonetheless, as pointed out by Clements et al (2004) the overall poor forecasting performance of nonlinear models requires further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, neural networks offer the potential for general purpose nonlinear time series forecasting. As stated in [42], a good nonlinear model should be general enough to capture some of the nonlinear phenomena in the data. Neural network load forecasters can be thought of as mappings from a set of previous load, current load and future climatology variables (i.e.…”
Section: Neural Network For Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%