2016
DOI: 10.4064/aa8418-5-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some relations between $t(a,b,c,d;n)$ and $N(a,b,c,d;n)$

Abstract: Let Z and N be the set of integers and the set of positive integers, respectively. For a, b, c, d, n ∈ N let N (a, b, c, d; n) be the number of representations of n by ax 2 + by 2 + cz 2 + dw 2 , and let t(a, b, c, d; n) be the number of representations of n by ax(x − 1)/2 + by(y − 1)/2 + cz(z − 1)/2 + dw(w − 1)/2 (x, y, z, w ∈ Z). In this paper we reveal some connections between t(a, b, c, d; n) and N (a, b, c, d; n).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the photoresponse time could not be measured, but it is expected to be shorter than a few tens of picoseconds, much beyond the photoexcited carrier relaxation time of graphene. [26] In addition, our vertically stacked structure allows fast separation and collection of photoexcited carriers because of the short channel length corresponding to the thickness of MLG (≈2.4 nm). [17] This is also significantly shorter than the carrier diffusion length of graphene (≈15-70 nm).…”
Section: Figure 1amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the photoresponse time could not be measured, but it is expected to be shorter than a few tens of picoseconds, much beyond the photoexcited carrier relaxation time of graphene. [26] In addition, our vertically stacked structure allows fast separation and collection of photoexcited carriers because of the short channel length corresponding to the thickness of MLG (≈2.4 nm). [17] This is also significantly shorter than the carrier diffusion length of graphene (≈15-70 nm).…”
Section: Figure 1amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon thereafter, Nagatani presented some improved lattice models including triangular lattice model, 22 two-dimensional lattice model, 23 highdimensional lattice model 24 and analyzed jamming transition in these models. [20][21][22][23][24][25] Since then, a number of new lattice models 10,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] considering di®erent factors were successively proposed in order to gain a good understanding of complex behavior of the vehicular tra±c°ow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From model structure aspect, the relative current was taken into account in the lattice hydrodynamics models, 27,34,36 or the optimal tra±c current is considered. 26,28,29,37,41 Furthermore, two-lane density di®erence lattice was presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of this, some was extended by position (density) information, 35,36 and others considered the relative current information. 37,38 As well as, the factors both position and relative current information have been simultaneously taken into account in a few lattice models. 39 It is easy to prove that these extended lattice models mentioned above can enhance the stabilization of the traffic system in some degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%