1968
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(68)80319-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks about 5f → 6d and charge transfer transitions in uranium(IV) and plutonium(IV) complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 5f 2 f 5f 1 6d 1 assignment for this unresolved band in the uranium bis(ketimide) complexes seems potentially attractive because such transitions should have large oscillator strengths and fairly broad bandwidths. Previous studies of classical U IV coordination complexes place this transition at higher energy; [21][22][23][24][25] however, the stronger σ-and π-interactions of the ketimide ligands with the metal center may stabilize some subset of metal 6d orbitals as well, thereby lowering the energy of the interconfiguration transition relative to that in, for example, the (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 U(CH 3 ) 2 complex. The ultimate uncertainty in assigning this transition is exacerbated by the much greater potential for mixing of excited states in these ketimide complexes as a result of more favorable metalligand orbital energy matching and greater metal-ligand bonding interactions.…”
Section: Uranium(iv) Fluoroketimidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 5f 2 f 5f 1 6d 1 assignment for this unresolved band in the uranium bis(ketimide) complexes seems potentially attractive because such transitions should have large oscillator strengths and fairly broad bandwidths. Previous studies of classical U IV coordination complexes place this transition at higher energy; [21][22][23][24][25] however, the stronger σ-and π-interactions of the ketimide ligands with the metal center may stabilize some subset of metal 6d orbitals as well, thereby lowering the energy of the interconfiguration transition relative to that in, for example, the (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 U(CH 3 ) 2 complex. The ultimate uncertainty in assigning this transition is exacerbated by the much greater potential for mixing of excited states in these ketimide complexes as a result of more favorable metalligand orbital energy matching and greater metal-ligand bonding interactions.…”
Section: Uranium(iv) Fluoroketimidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of articles reporting on the investigation of complexes by ultraviolet spectrophotometry is increasing, but the complexes investigated are becoming more exotic and of less potential use in analysis. Studies on metal complexes of possible interest include fluoro complexes of vanadium(V) (193) and molybdenum(VI) (209), tellurium(IV) with hydrochloric acid (344), iron(III) with sodium triphosphate (13), iron(III) chloro complexes in dimethylformamidestyrene (83), complex formation by iron(III) chloride and ammonia in an alcohol-dioxane mixture (317), peroxide complexes of niobium (V) and tantalum (V) in sulfuric acid (65), complexes of uranium (IV) and plutonium (IV) with chloride and oxygen containing ligands (316), nickel ß-ketoenolates (117), complexes of copper(II) with carboxylic acids (320), complexes of copper(II) and the uranyl ion with thioglycolic acid and pyruvic acid (319), V-salicylideneglycinato complexes with manganese(II), nickel(II), copper(II), and zinc (246), ethyl xanthate complexes with cadmium, zinc, nickel(II), and cobalt(II) (284), a complex of maltol with the uranyl ion (66), the silver(I) perchlorate-pyridine complex (25), mercury(II)cyanide-iodide complexes (70), mixed chlorothiocyanato complexes of palladium(II) (37), the copper(II)-5-chloro-8-hydroxyquinoline-7-sulfonate complex (21), selenocyanato complexes of thorium in acetone and dimethylformamide (151), chromate in sulfuric acid (257), platinum(IV)-dinitroethylenediamine complexes (64), gallium(III) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (63), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid with gadolinium(III) and lutetium(III) (234), and triethylenetetraminehexaacetic acid with cerium(III) and (IV) (164).…”
Section: Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of uranium (III) chloride has been measured in the molten eutectic mixture of MgC12-KC1-NaC1 [58-18-20 weight percent (w/o)] ( 14) in several mixtures of A1C13 and KC1 (or NaC1) of varying K(Na)C1/A1C13 ratios (15), and in the LiC1-KC1 eutectic (16). The effect of the activity of the chloride ions on the formation of complexes in ionic melts has been reported (14)(15)(16)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of uranium (III) chloride has been measured in the molten eutectic mixture of MgC12-KC1-NaC1 [58-18-20 weight percent (w/o)] ( 14) in several mixtures of A1C13 and KC1 (or NaC1) of varying K(Na)C1/A1C13 ratios (15), and in the LiC1-KC1 eutectic (16). The effect of the activity of the chloride ions on the formation of complexes in ionic melts has been reported (14)(15)(16)). An examination of the compiled data suggests that the complex compounds, MUC14(UC14 in NaC1-KC1, at 700~ M2UCI~ (UC152-'in LiC1-KC1, 450~176 and M3UCl~ (UCI~ 3 in NaC1, 700 ~ 845~ may have a considerable stability in the alkali halide-rich region of the respective molten mixtures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%